Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37932587›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2024

Characterization of an andexanet alfa administration protocol guided by drug-specific quantitative anti-Xa assays.

Holly T Lanham, Wassamon Viriyakitja, Mark Vestal, Ian Welsby, Bridgette Kram

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Specific Reversal Agents for Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Acute Stroke.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Holly T LanhamDepartment of Pharmacy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Drive, B131 VUH, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA. holly.t.lanham@vumc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0300-8633
Wassamon ViriyakitjaDepartment of Pharmacy, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA.
Mark VestalDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Ian WelsbyDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA.
Bridgette KramDepartment of Pharmacy, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University Hospital · USUniversity of Virginia Medical Center · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following FDA approval in 2018, consensus guidelines recommend andexanet alfa as first-line therapy for the management of life-threatening or uncontrollable bleeding in patients taking oral factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors. Dosing is based on the specific FXa inhibitor and dose, and the time elapsed since the patient's last administration of the medication. Additionally, at our institution, anti-FXa screens and drug-specific assays are obtained to guide subsequent dosing based on institution protocol. The objective of this study was to evaluate andexanet alfa utilization based on anti-Xa and FXa-inhibitor-specific assays and assess associated outcomes. This was a retrospective, single-center study aimed to describe the use of anti-FXa and specific direct oral anticoagulant assays to guide the utilization and administration of andexanet alfa. Secondary endpoints evaluated included thrombotic events during index hospitalization, hospital length of stay, hospital mortality, and discharge disposition. Overall, most patients were prescribed apixaban for atrial fibrillation and received andexanet alfa for reversal of intracranial hemorrhage in the emergency department. In general, DOAC-specific assays were concordant with last known times; however, there appears to be minimal correlation with DOAC-specific assay levels and survival. There were 9 thrombotic events (8.7%) in 8 patients. In this cohort, collection of an anti-FXa assay screen was a practical strategy to guide reversal with andexanet alfa; however, the addition of DOAC-specific assay levels may not enhance clinical utility.

Indexed as

Factor XaThrombosisAnticoagulantsFactor Xa InhibitorsHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsRecombinant ProteinsRetrospective StudiesRivaroxabanAnticoagulantsFactor XaFactor Xa InhibitorsPharmaceutical PreparationsPRT064445Recombinant ProteinsRivaroxabanAndexanet alfaAnti-FXa screenApixabanDOAC-levelsDOAC-reversalRivaroxaban

Identifiers

PMID37932587
OpenAlexW4388407483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.