Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37932582›Full record

ArticleInternational microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology2024

Molecular characterization and biofilm formation ability of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis bloodstream isolates from a Chinese tertiary hospital in Beijing.

Jing-Xian Yang, Cun-Wei Liu, Fu-Wei Wu, Ling Zhu, Guo-Wei Liang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genomic Epidemiology of Vancomycin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Isolation ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Food chemistry: X · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Comprehensive Study of Antibiotic Resistance inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jing-Xian YangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, China.
Cun-Wei LiuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, China.
Fu-Wei WuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, China.
Ling ZhuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, China.
Guo-Wei LiangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, China. lgw721@126.com.
Aerospace Center Hospital · CN

Funding

Capital Health Research and Development of Special Fund, Beijing, China 2020-4-6084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the molecular characteristics and biofilm-forming ability of 116 Enterococcus faecium (Efm) and 72 Enterococcus faecalis (Efs) isolates obtained from patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) at a Chinese hospital between July 2011 and March 2018. The presence of glycopeptide resistance genes and five virulence genes (esp, gelE, asa1, hyl, and cylA) was screened using two multiplex PCR. MLST was used to assess the clonality. Crystal violet staining was used to detect biofilms. Vancomycin resistance was detected in 30.1% of Efm and 2.8% of Efs isolates, respectively. All VRE strains carried the vanA gene. The esp, gelE, asa1, and cylA genes in 72 Efs strains were detected at 62.5%, 84.7%, 84.7%, and 69.4%, respectively. Among the 116 Efm isolates, 74.1% and 25.8% carried esp and hyl, respectively. The esp gene was significantly associated with vancomycin-resistant Efm (VREfm) compared to vancomycin-susceptible Efm (VSEfm). In total, 91.7% of Efs and 20.0% of Efm produced biofilms. Twenty-six STs were identified among the 72 Efs isolates, with ST4 (29.2%) being the predominant. In total, 116 Efm strains were grouped into 26 STs, with ST78 (46.6%) being the predominant. Both VREfm (41.7%) and VSEfm (48.8%) were dominant in ST78. There is no clear evidence suggesting that some STs are associated with vancomycin resistance or biofilm formation. Both Efm and Efs BSI isolates showed a polyclonal pattern with a dominant clone and many unique types, implying the coexistence of clonal dissemination and an influx of new clones. The horizontal transmission of resistance genes may play a more important role in VREfm prevalence than clonal expansion.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBiofilmsEnterococcus faecalisEnterococcus faeciumGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsMultilocus Sequence TypingTertiary Care CentersBacterial ProteinsBeijingHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsVancomycin ResistanceVirulence FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsVirulence FactorsBiofilmEnterococcus faecalisEnterococcus faeciumMultilocus sequence typingVancomycin-resistantVirulence

Identifiers

PMID37932582
PMCPMC11144123
OpenAlexW4388406312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.