ArticlePediatric cardiology2025
Stent Strut Dilation in Branch Pulmonary Artery Stenosis Following Stenting of Arterial Duct in Duct-dependent Pulmonary Circulation.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Fate of the Jailed Branch: Challenging the Dogma of PDA Stenting in Cases with a Pulmonary Artery Branch Originating from the PDA.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Re-interventions Following Patent Ductus Arteriosus Stenting During the Inter-stage Period.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Review
- Ductal Stenting Versus Aorto-Pulmonary Shunt for Lesions with Duct-Dependent Pulmonary Blood Flow: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Review
- Balloon-assisted stent strut dilation in branch pulmonary artery stenosis following ductal stenting: An observation from tertiary care center in Eastern India.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the feasibility and outcome of stent strut dilation after arterial duct stenting with associated branch pulmonary artery (BPA) stenosis. Stenting of arterial duct in infants with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation is technically challenging. The presence of BPA stenosis is a relative contraindication for stent implantation. Infants with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation and associated BPA stenosis were assessed either by transthoracic echocardiogram alone or additional computerized tomography angiogram when required. Following ductal stenting, the stent struts of the stenosed BPA were crossed with an additional 0.014″ coronary guide wire and dilated using coronary balloons (2.0 or 2.5 mm in diameter). Seventeen (12 male) patients were considered for the procedure. The median age and weight were 27 days (range 2-94) and 2.6 kg (range 2.2-5), respectively. Fourteen patients (82.4%) underwent stent strut dilation after arterial duct stenting. Struts to left pulmonary artery was opened in 9 (64.3%) and right pulmonary artery in 5 (35.7%). The mean systemic oxygen saturation increased from 66.23 ± 8.9% at baseline to 86 ± 2.2% immediately after the stent deployment and final saturations after stent strut dilation were 89.29 ± 4.3%. Angiographic pulmonary flow improved in all cases. Stent strut dilation could not be done in 3 patients due to unfavorable anatomy. One patient had acute stent thrombosis and died in the hospital. Two others died during follow-up, during an acute febrile illness and gastroenteritis. All survivors underwent cardiac surgery and were on regular follow-up. Strut dilation of BPA stenosis is feasible to augment pulmonary blood flow, following arterial duct stenting. This procedure may be useful in selected patients with BPA stenosis to have uniform growth of pulmonary arteries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.