ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024
A Systematic Approach for 3D Abdominal Lipodefinition.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background3D abdominal lipodefinition is a tool to eliminate localized fat and to enhance muscular definition. The aim of this article is to describe the standardization of defining the abdomen through 3D abdominal lipodefinition, taking into consideration the fat percentage to make the technique happen in a way the results turn out completely natural.
methodsA retrospective study of patients who underwent 3D abdominal lipodefinition by one of the authors (R.V). Patient selection criteria, preoperative markings and technique according to fat percentage, postoperative care, outcomes and complications are described.
resultsA total of 285 patients underwent 3D abdominal lipodefinition. The average age was of 33 years (18-45 years). One hundred and fifty (52.63%) of the patients had a fat percentage between 25 and 30%, 92 (32.28%) of the patients had 21-24%, and 43 (15.09%) of the patients had a fat percentage lower than 20%. The average fat volume extracted was of 1600 mL with a minimum of 800 mL and a maximum of 2000 mL. The average surgery time was of 100 min (84-118 min). Twenty-seven (9.47%) complications were observed, 15 (5.26%) had seromas and 7 (2.46%) developed hyperpigmentation on the negative areas. Asymmetries were observed in three patients (1.05%).
conclusionsThe standardization of the 3D abdominal lipodefinition technique is a systematic surgical approach associated to a classification dependent on the fat percentage of the patient and their physical build, that allows for results that are natural, according to each patient, reproducible and with a low complication index. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
37932505What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.