Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37932494›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2023

Corvids optimize working memory by categorizing continuous stimuli.

Aylin Apostel, Matthew Panichello, Timothy J Buschman, Jonas Rose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aylin ApostelNeural Basis of Learning, Department of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. aylin.klarer@ruhr-uni-bochum.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3882-7145
Matthew PanichelloDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0270-782X
Timothy J BuschmanPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1298-2761
Jonas RoseNeural Basis of Learning, Department of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. jonas.rose@ruhr-uni-bochum.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1745-727X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory (WM) is a crucial element of the higher cognition of primates and corvid songbirds. Despite its importance, WM has a severely limited capacity and is vulnerable to noise. In primates, attractor dynamics mitigate the effect of noise by discretizing continuous information. Yet, it remains unclear whether similar dynamics are seen in avian brains. Here, we show jackdaws (Corvus monedula) have similar behavioral biases as humans; memories are less precise and more biased as memory demands increase. Model-based analysis reveal discrete attractors are evenly spread across the stimulus space. Altogether, our comparative approach suggests attractor dynamics in primates and corvids mitigate the effect of noise by systematically drifting towards specific attractors. By demonstrating this effect in an evolutionary distant species, our results strengthen attractor dynamics as general, adaptive biological principle to efficiently use WM.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermSongbirdsAnimalsBrainCognitionHumansPrimates

Identifiers

PMID37932494
PMCPMC10628182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.