Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37932469›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of hematology2024

Distinct FDG PET/CT avidity among newly diagnosed intravascular large B-cell lymphoma patients: a descriptive observational study.

Danqing Zhao, Yan Zhang, Wenjia Zhu, Li Huo, Daobin Zhou, Wei Wang, Chong Wei, Wei Zhang

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. [Recurrent fever, persistent cytopenia].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cutaneous Intravascular Hematolymphoid Entities: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Danqing Zhao *Department of Hematology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yan Zhang *Department of Hematology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Wenjia ZhuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Li HuoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Daobin ZhouDepartment of Hematology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Hematology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Chong WeiDepartment of Hematology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Hematology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. vv1223@vip.sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9489-5965

Funding

National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2022-PUMCH-A-192the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences 2021-12M-C&T-B-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL) is a rare type of aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that poses a great diagnostic challenge due to its highly heterogenous clinical manifestations. Although 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is widely used as a diagnostic tool for patients suspected of having lymphoma, as it reveals FDG-avid lesions, the FDG avidity of IVLBCL has not been extensively characterized. Here, we present a comprehensive report of FDG avidity in IVLBCL and its association with clinicopathological features and survival. This descriptive observational study included consecutive patients aged at least 18 years diagnosed with IVLBCL in Peking Union Medical Hospital across 9 years. Among 50 screened IVLBCL patients, 42 had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT to detect possible lesions for biopsy before pathological diagnosis; their FDG PET/CT (positron emission computed tomography, PET/CT) reports were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoint was the clinical description of FDG avidity of newly diagnosed intravascular large B-cell lymphoma and frequency. A total of 73.8% patients showed FDG-avid lesions, with a median SUVmax of 7.4 (range 1-27.7), which was lower than that for other aggressive lymphomas. Clinicopathological features were the same between the FDG-avid group and the non-FDG-avid group, except that the latter had a higher Ki-67 index (median 90% in the nonavid group vs. 80% in the avid group, P = 0.043). The overall survival rate was not different between the PET/CT groups. Our findings demonstrate that FDG PET/CT is a useful diagnostic tool for detecting FDG-avid lesions in IVLBCL patients. A random skin biopsy is essential for assisting in the diagnosis of IVLBCL, even for those with negative PET/CT.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffusePositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdolescentAdultFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaFDG avidityIntravascular large B-cell lymphomaPET/CTPrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.