Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37932462›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2023

Generalizable attention U-Net for segmentation of fibroglandular tissue and background parenchymal enhancement in breast DCE-MRI.

Sylwia Nowakowska, Karol Borkowski, Carlotta M Ruppert, Anna Landsmann, Magda Marcon, Nicole Berger, Andreas Boss, Alexander Ciritsis, Cristina Rossi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Evolution and Clinical Impact of Deep Learning Technologies in Breast MRI.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sylwia NowakowskaDiagnostic and interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. sylwia.nowakowska@usz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9463-7640
Karol Borkowskib-rayZ AG, Wagistrasse 21, 8952, Schlieren, Switzerland.
Carlotta M RuppertDiagnostic and interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Anna LandsmannDiagnostic and interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Magda MarconDiagnostic and interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicole BergerDiagnostic and interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andreas BossDiagnostic and interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Alexander CiritsisDiagnostic and interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Cristina RossiDiagnostic and interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

Universität Zürich CRPP Artificial Intelligence in oncological Imaging
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDevelopment of automated segmentation models enabling standardized volumetric quantification of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) from native volumes and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) from subtraction volumes of dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. Subsequent assessment of the developed models in the context of FGT and BPE Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-compliant classification.

methodsFor the training and validation of attention U-Net models, data coming from a single 3.0-T scanner was used. For testing, additional data from 1.5-T scanner and data acquired in a different institution with a 3.0-T scanner was utilized. The developed models were used to quantify the amount of FGT and BPE in 80 DCE-MRI examinations, and a correlation between these volumetric measures and the classes assigned by radiologists was performed.

resultsTo assess the model performance using application-relevant metrics, the correlation between the volumes of breast, FGT, and BPE calculated from ground truth masks and predicted masks was checked. Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.963 ± 0.004 to 0.999 ± 0.001 were achieved. The Spearman correlation coefficient for the quantitative and qualitative assessment, i.e., classification by radiologist, of FGT amounted to 0.70 (p < 0.0001), whereas BPE amounted to 0.37 (p = 0.0006).

conclusionsGeneralizable algorithms for FGT and BPE segmentation were developed and tested. Our results suggest that when assessing FGT, it is sufficient to use volumetric measures alone. However, for the evaluation of BPE, additional models considering voxels' intensity distribution and morphology are required. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A standardized assessment of FGT density can rely on volumetric measures, whereas in the case of BPE, the volumetric measures constitute, along with voxels' intensity distribution and morphology, an important factor. KEY POINTS: • Our work contributes to the standardization of FGT and BPE assessment. • Attention U-Net can reliably segment intricately shaped FGT and BPE structures. • The developed models were robust to domain shift.

Indexed as

Assessment standardizationBackground parenchymal enhancement segmentationBreast MRIDeep learningFibroglandular tissue segmentation

Identifiers

PMID37932462
PMCPMC10628070
OpenAlexW4388409093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.