Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37932390›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Application research of AI-assisted compressed sensing technology in MRI scanning of the knee joint: 3D-MRI perspective.

Ming Ni, Miao He, Yuxin Yang, Xiaoyi Wen, Yuqing Zhao, Lixiang Gao, Ruixin Yan, Jiajia Xu, Yarui Zhang, Wen Chen and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07164651 (Prospective Application Study of Intelligent Accelerated Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Children With Abdominal Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07164651 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Application Study of Intelligent Accelerated Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Children With Abdominal Pain

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorYaqi Shen,MD,PhDRan2025 to 2027Enrolled150ConditionsPediatric Abdominal PainArmsAccelerated MRI scanning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction in Musculoskeletal MRI.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ming Ni *Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Miao He *School of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, People's Republic of China.
Yuxin YangUnited Imaging Research Institute of Intelligent Imaging, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyi WenInstitute of Statistics and Big Data, Renmin University of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yuqing ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Lixiang GaoDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Ruixin YanDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jiajia XuDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yarui ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Wen ChenDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Chenyu JiangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yali LiDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Qiang ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Peng WuUnited Imaging Healthcare Co, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Chunlin LiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, People's Republic of China.
Junda QuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, People's Republic of China. qujunda@ccmu.edu.cn.
Huishu YuanDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China. huishuy@bjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5320-4360
Peking University · CNCapital Medical University · CNUnited Imaging Healthcare (China) · CNRenmin University of China · CN

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation 7212126Beijing New Health Industry Development Foundation XM2020-02-006National Natural Science Foundation of China 82171927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the potential applicability of AI-assisted compressed sensing (ACS) in knee MRI to enhance and optimize the scanning process.

methodsVolunteers and patients with sports-related injuries underwent prospective MRI scans with a range of acceleration techniques. The volunteers were subjected to varied ACS acceleration levels to ascertain the most effective level. Patients underwent scans at the determined optimal 3D-ACS acceleration level, and 3D compressed sensing (CS) and 2D parallel acquisition technology (PAT) scans were performed. The resultant 3D-ACS images underwent 3.5 mm/2.0 mm multiplanar reconstruction (MPR). Experienced radiologists evaluated and compared the quality of images obtained by 3D-ACS-MRI and 3D-CS-MRI, 3.5 mm/2.0 mm MPR and 2D-PAT-MRI, diagnosed diseases, and compared the results with the arthroscopic findings. The diagnostic agreement was evaluated using Cohen's kappa correlation coefficient, and both absolute and relative evaluation methods were utilized for objective assessment.

resultsThe study involved 15 volunteers and 53 patients. An acceleration factor of 10.69 × was identified as optimal. The quality evaluation showed that 3D-ACS provided poorer bone structure visualization, and improved cartilage visualization and less satisfactory axial images with 3.5 mm/2.0 mm MPR than 2D-PAT. In terms of objective evaluation, the relative evaluation yielded satisfactory results across different groups, while the absolute evaluation revealed significant variances in most features. Nevertheless, high levels of diagnostic agreement (κ: 0.81-0.94) and accuracy (0.83-0.98) were observed across all diagnoses.

conclusionACS technology presents significant potential as a replacement for traditional CS in 3D-MRI knee scans, allowing thinner MPRs and markedly faster scans without sacrificing diagnostic accuracy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: 3D-ACS-MRI of the knee can be completed in the 160 s with good diagnostic consistency and image quality. 3D-MRI-MPR can replace 2D-MRI and reconstruct images with thinner slices, which helps to optimize the current MRI examination process and shorten scanning time. KEY POINTS: • AI-assisted compressed sensing technology can reduce knee MRI scan time by over 50%. • 3D AI-assisted compressed sensing MRI and related multiplanar reconstruction can replace traditional accelerated MRI and yield thinner 2D multiplanar reconstructions. • Successful application of 3D AI-assisted compressed sensing MRI can help optimize the current knee MRI process.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultArtificial IntelligenceData CompressionFemaleHumansKnee InjuriesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesYoung AdultArtificial intelligenceComputer-assistedImage processingKneeMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID37932390
OpenAlexW4388440750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.