ArticleEye (London, England)2024
Monitoring compliance to topical therapy in children and young people with uveitis.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment outcomes of a Swiss non-infectious paediatric uveitis cohort: retrospective study over ten years.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2025Article
- A Retrospective Data Analysis of Patients Treated with Difluprednate and Bromfenac for Cystoid Macular Edema After Uveitis or Cataract Surgery.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesUveitis in children and young people (CYP) is a rare but potentially debilitating condition. Steroid eye drops are the first step in treatment and poor compliance may result in vision-threatening complications. This study aims to measure compliance with prescribed eye drops prospectively in a child-specific manner. SUBJECTS/
methodsPatients aged 0-18 years attending a tertiary paediatric uveitis clinic using steroid drops were recruited. Both the CYP, and person with parental responsibility (PPR) completed questionnaires about compliance. A subgroup had bottles of Prednisolone 1% drops dispensed and weighed at the first appointment and reweighed at follow-up. The weight reduction was compared with expected weight change over the interval.
resultsThe study was completed by 42 patients of the 50 patients recruited. Thirty-one CYP and their respective PPR completed both questionnaires, 11 completed only one questionnaire (9 CYP, 2 PPR). Drop errors for all eye drops were reported more than "once a week" by 13/39 CYP (33.3%, 95% CI: 19.1%-50.2% of respondents), and 3/31 PPR (9.7%, CI: 19.1%-50.2% of respondents). Many PPR could not recall prescribed drop frequency (n = 13/31, 40.6%, CI: 23.7%-59.4% of respondents). Twelve patients had bottles weighed and returned. Insufficient weight reduction was found in 9 (75%, CI: 42.8%-94.5%). Within the eye drop weighing subgroup three participants (25%, CI: 5.5%-57.2%) used <50% the expected weight of drops.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated poor eye drop compliance in CYP with uveitis. Self-reported compliance was unreliable in this population. Worryingly, some patients miss more than 50% of drops and may suffer sub-optimal disease control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.