ArticleScientific reports2023
Image-based crop disease detection with federated learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated design of an efficient multi spectral imaging and federated learning framework for precision crop disease diagnosis in low-resource farming communities.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Federated learning with dynamic weighted aggregation for multi-crop disease detection: a hybrid CNN-transformer approach.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Breeding for Plant Disease Resistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- Iterative segmentation and classification for enhanced crop disease diagnosis using optimized hybrid U-Nets model.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Integrating deep learning for visual question answering in Agricultural Disease Diagnostics: Case Study of Wheat Rust.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Spatial interpolation of global DEM using federated deep learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crop disease detection and management is critical to improving productivity, reducing costs, and promoting environmentally friendly crop treatment methods. Modern technologies, such as data mining and machine learning algorithms, have been used to develop automated crop disease detection systems. However, centralized approach to data collection and model training induces challenges in terms of data privacy, availability, and transfer costs. To address these challenges, federated learning appears to be a promising solution. In this paper, we explored the application of federated learning for crop disease classification using image analysis. We developed and studied convolutional neural network (CNN) models and those based on attention mechanisms, in this case vision transformers (ViT), using federated learning, leveraging an open access image dataset from the "PlantVillage" platform. Experiments conducted concluded that the performance of models trained by federated learning is influenced by the number of learners involved, the number of communication rounds, the number of local iterations and the quality of the data. With the objective of highlighting the potential of federated learning in crop disease classification, among the CNN models tested, ResNet50 performed better in several experiments than the other models, and proved to be an optimal choice, but also the most suitable for a federated learning scenario. The ViT_B16 and ViT_B32 Vision Transformers require more computational time, making them less suitable in a federated learning scenario, where computational time and communication costs are key parameters. The paper provides a state-of-the-art analysis, presents our methodology and experimental results, and concludes with ideas and future directions for our research on using federated learning in the context of crop disease classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.