Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37932317›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Avoiding inferior clusterings with misspecified Gaussian mixture models.

Siva Rajesh Kasa, Vaibhav Rajan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Siva Rajesh KasaSchool of Computing, National University of Singapore, COM1, 13, Computing Dr, Singapore, 117417, Singapore. kasa@u.nus.edu.
Vaibhav RajanSchool of Computing, National University of Singapore, COM1, 13, Computing Dr, Singapore, 117417, Singapore.
National University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clustering is a fundamental tool for exploratory data analysis, and is ubiquitous across scientific disciplines. Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) is a popular probabilistic and interpretable model for clustering. In many practical settings, the true data distribution, which is unknown, may be non-Gaussian and may be contaminated by noise or outliers. In such cases, clustering may still be done with a misspecified GMM. However, this may lead to incorrect classification of the underlying subpopulations. In this paper, we identify and characterize the problem of inferior clustering solutions. Similar to well-known spurious solutions, these inferior solutions have high likelihood and poor cluster interpretation; however, they differ from spurious solutions in other characteristics, such as asymmetry in the fitted components. We theoretically analyze this asymmetry and its relation to misspecification. We propose a new penalty term that is designed to avoid both inferior and spurious solutions. Using this penalty term, we develop a new model selection criterion and a new GMM-based clustering algorithm, SIA. We empirically demonstrate that, in cases of misspecification, SIA avoids inferior solutions and outperforms previous GMM-based clustering methods.

Identifiers

PMID37932317
PMCPMC10628229
OpenAlexW4388413535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.