Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37932191›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2024

European astronaut radiation related cancer risk assessment using dosimetric calculations of organ dose equivalents.

Linda Walsh, Luana Hafner, Thomas Berger, Daniel Matthiä, Uwe Schneider, Ulrich Straube

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Linda WalshDepartment of Physics, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland. Electronic address: linda.walsh@uzh.ch.
Luana HafnerSwiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate ENSI, Industriestrasse 19, 5201 Brugg, Switzerland. Electronic address: luana.hafner@ensi.ch.
Thomas BergerGerman Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Linder Höhe, 51147 Köln, Germany. Electronic address: thomas.berger@dlr.de.
Daniel MatthiäGerman Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Linder Höhe, 51147 Köln, Germany. Electronic address: daniel.matthiae@dlr.de.
Uwe SchneiderDepartment of Physics, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland. Electronic address: uwe.schneider@uzh.ch.
Ulrich StraubeEuropean Space Agency ESA, European Astronaut Centre EAC, Space Medicine HRE-OM, Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: ulrich.straube@ext.esa.int.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An illustrative sample mission of a Mars swing-by mission lasting one calendar year was chosen to highlight the application of European risk assessment software to cancer (all solid cancer plus leukaemia) risks from radiation exposures in space quantified with organ dose equivalent rates from model calculations based on the quantity Radiation Attributed Decrease of Survival (RADS). The relevant dose equivalent to the colon for radiation exposures from this Mars swing-by mission were found to vary between 198 and 482 mSv. These doses depend on sex and the two other factors investigated here of: solar activity phase (maximum or minimum); and the choice of space radiation quality factor used in the calculations of dose equivalent. Such doses received at typical astronaut ages around 40 years old will result in: the probability of surviving until retirement age (65 years) being reduced by a range from 0.38% (95%CI: 0.29; 0.49) to 1.29% (95%CI: 1.06; 1.56); and the probability of surviving cancer free until retirement age being reduced by a range from 0.78% (95%CI: 0.59; 0.99) to 2.63% (95%CI: 2.16; 3.18). As expected from the features of the models applied to quantify the general dosimetric and radiation epidemiology parameters, the cancer incidence risks in terms of surviving cancer free, are higher than the cancer mortality risks in terms of surviving, the risks for females are higher than for males, and the risks at solar minimum are higher than at solar maximum.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRadiation ProtectionSpace FlightAdultAgedAstronautsFemaleHumansMaleRadiation DosageRisk AssessmentAstronaut risk assessmentDosimetric methodologyEpidemiologyRadiation attributed decrease of survivalRadiation related cancer risks

Identifiers

PMID37932191
PMCPMC10919965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.