Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37931969›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2023

Systematic review of seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and appraisal of evidence, prior to the widespread introduction of vaccine programmes in the WHO European Region, January-December 2020.

Aisling Vaughan, Erika Duffell, Gudrun S Freidl, Diogo Simão Lemos, Anthony Nardone, M Valenciano, Lorenzo Subissi, Isabel Bergeri, Eeva K Broberg, Pasi Penttinen and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Improving public health laboratory preparedness at European Union level: learning points from experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Aisling VaughanWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark vaughana@who.int.ORCID 0000-0002-5966-2303
Erika DuffellEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden.
Gudrun S FreidlWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Diogo Simão LemosWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anthony NardoneEpiconcept SAS, Paris, France.
M ValencianoEpiconcept SAS, Paris, France.
Lorenzo SubissiWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Isabel BergeriWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Eeva K BrobergEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2693-7224
Pasi PenttinenEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden.
Richard PebodyWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maria KeramarouEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden.
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control · SEWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe · DKWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSystematic review of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence studies undertaken in the WHO European Region to measure pre-existing and cumulative seropositivity prior to the roll out of vaccination programmes.

designA systematic review of the literature. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the preprint servers MedRxiv and BioRxiv in the WHO 'COVID-19 Global literature on coronavirus disease' database using a predefined search strategy. Articles were supplemented with unpublished WHO-supported Unity-aligned seroprevalence studies and other studies reported directly to WHO Regional Office for Europe and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies published before the widespread implementation of COVID-19 vaccination programmes in January 2021 among the general population and blood donors, at national and regional levels. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: At least two independent researchers extracted the eligible studies; a third researcher resolved any disagreements. Study risk of bias was assessed using a quality scoring system based on sample size, sampling and testing methodologies.

resultsIn total, 111 studies from 26 countries published or conducted between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2020 across the WHO European Region were included. A significant heterogeneity in implementation was noted across the studies, with a paucity of studies from the east of the Region. Sixty-four (58%) studies were assessed to be of medium to high risk of bias. Overall, SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity prior to widespread community circulation was very low. National seroprevalence estimates after circulation started ranged from 0% to 51.3% (median 2.2% (IQR 0.7-5.2%); n=124), while subnational estimates ranged from 0% to 52% (median 5.8% (IQR 2.3%-12%); n=101), with the highest estimates in areas following widespread local transmission.

conclusionsThe low levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibody in most populations prior to the start of vaccine programmes underlines the critical importance of targeted vaccination of priority groups at risk of severe disease, while maintaining reduced levels of transmission to minimise population morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansSARS-CoV-2Seroepidemiologic StudiesWorld Health OrganizationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19epidemiologyinfectious diseasespublic healthsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37931969
PMCPMC10632881
OpenAlexW4388424917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.