ArticleArchivos de cardiologia de Mexico2023
[Pediatric telecardiology experience in the COVID-19 pandemic context].
Article in Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a global impact on public health services. Using new strategies through telehealth for the management of patients with congenital heart disease was the challenge. Objective: To describe the experience in telecardiology, and the strategies implemented during the pandemic. Method: Retrospective, qualitative study that includes the period from April 2020 to April 2021. Inquiries were received through the service's official e-mail or telephone. They were classified according to the type of concern and complexity of heart disease using color coding. The responses were asynchronous (by e-mail) or synchronous (videoconferences). The videoconferences were made using a secure platform (Cisco-Webex). Results: From April 2020 to April 2021, a total of 3372 queries were answered. The responses were distributed via e-mail (64.9%), phone calls (1.2%) and videoconferences (14.5%). The most frequent reasons for consultation were the request for missed appointments (68%), and remote clinical monitoring (20%). A total of 2296 families was contacted. Only 14.1% of the inquiries were cited in person. With color coding, a stratification was performed according to urgency. Conclusions: Telehealth proved to be a useful tool for the clinical management of patients with congenital heart disease in their place of origin. It prevented a considerable number of transfers, identified patients at risk rapidly, comforted families, and strengthened ties with local hospitals that make up the health network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.