Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37931236›Full record

ArticleBJS open2023

Machine learning models to predict surgical case duration compared to current industry standards: scoping review.

Christopher Spence, Owais A Shah, Anna Cebula, Keith Tucker, David Sochart, Deiary Kader, Vipin Asopa

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher SpenceAcademic Surgical Unit, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, Surrey, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3871-5637
Owais A ShahAcademic Surgical Unit, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, Surrey, UK.
Anna CebulaAcademic Surgical Unit, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, Surrey, UK.
Keith TuckerAcademic Surgical Unit, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, Surrey, UK.
David SochartAcademic Surgical Unit, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, Surrey, UK.
Deiary KaderAcademic Surgical Unit, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, Surrey, UK.
Vipin AsopaAcademic Surgical Unit, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, Surrey, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical waiting lists have risen dramatically across the UK as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The effective use of operating theatres by optimal scheduling could help mitigate this, but this requires accurate case duration predictions. Current standards for predicting the duration of surgery are inaccurate. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers the potential for greater accuracy in predicting surgical case duration. This study aimed to investigate whether there is evidence to support that AI is more accurate than current industry standards at predicting surgical case duration, with a secondary aim of analysing whether the implementation of the models used produced efficiency savings.

methodPubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE libraries were searched through to July 2023 to identify appropriate articles. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews and the Arksey and O'Malley framework were followed. Study quality was assessed using a modified version of the reporting guidelines for surgical AI papers by Farrow et al. Algorithm performance was reported using evaluation metrics.

resultsThe search identified 2593 articles: 14 were suitable for inclusion and 13 reported on the accuracy of AI algorithms against industry standards, with seven demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in prediction accuracy (P < 0.05). The larger studies demonstrated the superiority of neural networks over other machine learning techniques. Efficiency savings were identified in a RCT. Significant methodological limitations were identified across most studies.

conclusionThe studies suggest that machine learning and deep learning models are more accurate at predicting the duration of surgery; however, further research is required to determine the best way to implement this technology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCOVID-19BenchmarkingHumansMachine LearningPandemics

Identifiers

PMID37931236
PMCPMC10630142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.