Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37931233›Full record

ArticleBJS open2023

Total neoadjuvant therapy followed by a watch-and-wait strategy for patients with rectal cancer (TOWARd): protocol for single-arm phase II/III confirmatory trial (JCOG2010).

Tadayoshi Hashimoto, Shunsuke Tsukamoto, Keiko Murofushi, Yoshinori Ito, Hidekazu Hirano, Yuichiro Tsukada, Keita Sasaki, Junki Mizusawa, Haruhiko Fukuda, Atsuo Takashima and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Organ preservation with total neoadjuvant therapy in early-stage rectal cancer: A statewide analysis.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tadayoshi HashimotoJapan Clinical Oncology Group Data Centre/Operations Office, National Cancer Centre Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3759-1214
Shunsuke TsukamotoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Centre Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5143-6312
Keiko MurofushiDivision of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Centre Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshinori ItoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hidekazu HiranoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1343-1419
Yuichiro TsukadaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Centre Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Keita SasakiJapan Clinical Oncology Group Data Centre/Operations Office, National Cancer Centre Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0005-5100-3863
Junki MizusawaJapan Clinical Oncology Group Data Centre/Operations Office, National Cancer Centre Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8123-5298
Haruhiko FukudaJapan Clinical Oncology Group Data Centre/Operations Office, National Cancer Centre Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsuo TakashimaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukihide KanemitsuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Centre Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3366-3826
National Cancer Centre Japan · JPShowa University · JPTokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital · JP

Funding

AMED JP23ck0106836National Cancer Centre Research and Development Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadical surgery is the standard treatment for rectal cancer, but can impact quality of life. Recently, the concept of total neoadjuvant therapy with a watch-and-wait strategy has been proposed in which patients with a cCR after total neoadjuvant therapy do not proceed to surgery. However, most investigations of a watch-and-wait strategy have reported cases where cCR was achieved coincidentally via total neoadjuvant therapy. The aim is to assess whether total neoadjuvant therapy is effective in early-stage rectal cancer in patients that achieve cCR and are offered a watch-and-wait strategy.

methodsJCOG2010 (TOWARd) is a multi-institutional, single-arm phase II/III confirmatory investigation of the safety and efficacy of total neoadjuvant therapy followed by a watch-and-wait strategy for rectal cancer. Key eligibility criteria include cT2-3 N0 M0 rectal adenocarcinoma, tumour diameter less than or equal to 5 cm, age 18-75 years, performance status 0-1, and no history of pelvic irradiation or rectal surgery. Total neoadjuvant therapy involves neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (capecitabine and radiotherapy: 45 Gy/25 fractions to the whole pelvis plus boost of 5.4 Gy/3 fractions to the primary tumour) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (four cycles of capecitabine/oxaliplatin). Patients will be re-staged every 8 weeks after total neoadjuvant therapy, and those who achieve cCR will undergo a watch-and-wait strategy, those with near complete response will undergo a watch-and-wait strategy or local resection, and those with an incomplete response will undergo radical surgery. The primary endpoint is the cCR rate in phase II and 5-year overall survival in phase III. Secondary endpoints include postoperative anal, urinary, and sexual function. A total of 105 patients (phase II, 40 patients; phase III, 65 patients) will be enrolled over 3.5 years.

conclusionThis trial will determine whether total neoadjuvant therapy and a watch-and-wait strategy is an effective alternative to radical surgery for early-stage rectal cancer in patients with cT2-3 N0 M0 and tumour size less than or equal to 5 cm. REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs031220288 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs031220288).

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedCapecitabineClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicHumansMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCapecitabine

Identifiers

PMID37931233
PMCPMC10627521
OpenAlexW4388406750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.