Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37931183›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of public health2024

Adaptive Designs in Implementation Science and Practice: Their Promise and the Need for Greater Understanding and Improved Communication.

Amy Kilbourne, Matthew Chinman, Shari Rogal, Daniel Almirall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Using After Action Review to Identify Rapid Response Implementation Strategies for Emerging Drugs Among Youth.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amy KilbourneQuality Enhancement Research Initiative, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Matthew ChinmanRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Shari RogalCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Daniel AlmirallInstitute for Social Research and Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR)UM1TR004404 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Julie C Lumeng · 2023 to 2026
$39.8M
Pilot and Mentoring CoreP50DA054039 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SUSAN A MURPHY · 2021 to 2026
$18.2M
Novel Methods for Intensive Longitudinal Data in SMART Studies of Drug Abuse and HIVR01DA039901 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALMIRALL, DANIEL, NAHUM-SHANI, INBAL BILLIE · 2015 to 2024
$5.4M
Reducing disparities in cardiovascular health in community mental health settings: optimizing implementation strategiesUH3HL154280 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Gail L. Daumit, AMY M KILBOURNE · 2023 to 2026
$4.9M
Improving Student Mental Health: Adaptive Implementation of School-based CBTR01MH114203 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KILBOURNE, AMY M · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
Achieving Cardiovascular Health Equity in Community Mental Health: Optimizing Implementation StrategiesUG3HL154280 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DAUMIT, GAIL L., KILBOURNE, AMY M · 2020 to 2022
$3.4M
Improving the Implementation of Evidence-based Drug Prevention Programs in SchoolsR01DA048910 · NIDA · RAND CORPORATION · PI CHINMAN, MATTHEW, PHILLIPS, ANDREA · 2020 to 2025
$3.4M
Improving Pain Management and Opioid Safety for Patients with CirrhosisK23DA048182 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ROGAL, SHARI S · 2020 to 2023
$755k
Evaluating the Use of Peer Specialists to Deliver Cognitive Behavioral Social Skills TrainingI01HX002344 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI CHINMAN, MATTHEW, GRANHOLM, ERIC L · 2018 to 2025
–
HSR&D Research Career Scientist AwardIK6HX003767 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI MATTHEW CHINMAN · 2023 to 2026
–
HSRD VA I01 HX002344HSRD VA IK6 HX003767NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004404NHLBI NIH HHS UG3 HL154280NHLBI NIH HHS UH3 HL154280NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA048182NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA054039NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039901NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048910NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The promise of adaptation and adaptive designs in implementation science has been hindered by the lack of clarity and precision in defining what it means to adapt, especially regarding the distinction between adaptive study designs and adaptive implementation strategies. To ensure a common language for science and practice, authors reviewed the implementation science literature and found that the term adaptive was used to describe interventions, implementation strategies, and trial designs. To provide clarity and offer recommendations for reporting and strengthening study design, we propose a taxonomy that describes fixed versus adaptive implementation strategies and implementation trial designs. To improve impact, (

Indexed as

Implementation ScienceResearch DesignCommunicationHumansadaptationcluster randomized designcommunity engagementimplementation strategiesquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID37931183
PMCPMC11070446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.