ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2023
Deleterious and Adaptive Mutations in Plant Germplasm Conserved Ex Situ.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Measuring the change in deleterious mutation burden of barley germplasm conserved over one regeneration cycle.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Integrated genomic-transcriptomic analysis of clavulanic acid production in differentially productive Streptomyces clavuligerus strains.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Accumulating Heterozygous Deleterious Mutations in Conserved Soybean Germplasm over Successive Regenerations.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Elevated Mutation Burdens in Canadian Oat and Wheat Cultivars Released over the Past Century.Cells · 2025Article
- Flax domesticationprocesses as inferred from genome-wide SNP data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Patterns of the Predicted Mutation Burden in 19,778 Domesticated Barley Accessions Conserved Ex Situ.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Will a plant germplasm accession conserved in a genebank change genetically over time?Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conserving more than 7 million plant germplasm accessions in 1,750 genebanks worldwide raises the hope of securing the food supply for humanity for future generations. However, there is a genetic cost for such long-term germplasm conservation, which has been largely unaccounted for before. We investigated the extent and variation of deleterious and adaptive mutations in 490 individual plants representing barley, wheat, oat, soybean, maize, rapa, and sunflower collections in a seed genebank using RNA-Seq technology. These collections were found to have a range of deleterious mutations detected from 125 (maize) to 83,695 (oat) with a mean of 13,537 and of the averaged sample-wise mutation burden per deleterious locus from 0.069 to 0.357 with a mean of 0.200. Soybean and sunflower collections showed that accessions acquired earlier had increased mutation burdens. The germplasm with more years of storage in several collections carried more deleterious and fewer adaptive mutations. The samples with more cycles of germplasm regeneration revealed fewer deleterious and more adaptive mutations. These findings are significant for understanding mutational dynamics and genetic cost in conserved germplasm and have implications for long-term germplasm management and conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.