Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37931137›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2023

Automating Intended Target Identification for Paraphasias in Discourse Using a Large Language Model.

Alexandra C Salem, Robert C Gale, Mikala Fleegle, Gerasimos Fergadiotis, Steven Bedrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in psychology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexandra C SalemDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.ORCID 0000-0002-0645-8472
Robert C GaleDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Mikala FleegleDepartment of Speech & Hearing Sciences, Portland State University, OR.
Gerasimos FergadiotisDepartment of Speech & Hearing Sciences, Portland State University, OR.ORCID 0000-0002-3283-3838
Steven BedrickDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.ORCID 0000-0002-0163-9397

Funding

Algorithmic Classification of ParaphasiasR01DC015999 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BEDRICK, STEVEN, FERGADIOTIS, GERASIMOS · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo date, there are no automated tools for the identification and fine-grained classification of paraphasias within discourse, the production of which is the hallmark characteristic of most people with aphasia (PWA). In this work, we fine-tune a large language model (LLM) to automatically predict paraphasia targets in Cinderella story retellings.

methodData consisted of 332 Cinderella story retellings containing 2,489 paraphasias from PWA, for which research assistants identified their intended targets. We supplemented these training data with 256 sessions from control participants, to which we added 2,415 synthetic paraphasias. We conducted four experiments using different training data configurations to fine-tune the LLM to automatically "fill in the blank" of the paraphasia with a predicted target, given the context of the rest of the story retelling. We tested the experiments' predictions against our human-identified targets and stratified our results by ambiguity of the targets and clinical factors.

resultsThe model trained on controls and PWA achieved 50.7% accuracy at exactly matching the human-identified target. Fine-tuning on PWA data, with or without controls, led to comparable performance. The model performed better on targets with less human ambiguity and on paraphasias from participants with fluent or less severe aphasia.

conclusionsWe were able to automatically identify the intended target of paraphasias in discourse using just the surrounding language about half of the time. These findings take us a step closer to automatic aphasic discourse analysis. In future work, we will incorporate phonological information from the paraphasia to further improve predictive utility. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24463543.

Indexed as

AphasiaLanguageHumansLinguistics

Identifiers

PMID37931137
PMCPMC11001375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.