ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023
Free energies at QM accuracy from force fields via multimap targeted estimation.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scalable Boltzmann generators for equilibrium sampling of large-scale materials.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Enhanced Sampling in the Age of Machine Learning: Algorithms and Applications.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Toward Improving Multiple Time Step QM/MM Simulations with Δ-Machine Learning.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Accurate Lattice Free Energies of Packing Polymorphs from Probabilistic Generative Models.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Machine learning in molecular biophysics: Protein allostery, multi-level free energy simulations, and lipid phase transitions.Biophysics reviews · 2025Review
- Refining Ligand Poses in RNA/Ligand Complexes of Pharmaceutical Relevance: A Perspective by QM/MM Simulations and NMR Measurements.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025Review
- Assessing the Accuracy and Efficiency of Free Energy Differences Obtained fromJournal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Accurate and Efficient Multilevel Free Energy Simulations with Neural Network-Assisted Enhanced Sampling.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate predictions of ligand binding affinities would greatly accelerate the first stages of drug discovery campaigns. However, using highly accurate interatomic potentials based on quantum mechanics (QM) in free energy methods has been so far largely unfeasible due to their prohibitive computational cost. Here, we present an efficient method to compute QM free energies from simulations using cheap reference potentials, such as force fields (FFs). This task has traditionally been out of reach due to the slow convergence of computing the correction from the FF to the QM potential. To overcome this bottleneck, we generalize targeted free energy methods to employ multiple maps-implemented with normalizing flow neural networks (NNs)-that maximize the overlap between the distributions. Critically, the method requires neither a separate expensive training phase for the NNs nor samples from the QM potential. We further propose a one-epoch learning policy to efficiently avoid overfitting, and we combine our approach with enhanced sampling strategies to overcome the pervasive problem of poor convergence due to slow degrees of freedom. On the drug-like molecules in the HiPen dataset, the method accelerates the calculation of the free energy difference of switching from an FF to a DFTB3 potential by three orders of magnitude compared to standard free energy perturbation and by a factor of eight compared to previously published nonequilibrium calculations. Our results suggest that our method, in combination with efficient QM/MM calculations, may be used in lead optimization campaigns in drug discovery and to study protein-ligand molecular recognition processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.