Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37931094›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Cell-type-specific optogenetic stimulation of the locus coeruleus induces slow-onset potentiation and enhances everyday memory in rats.

Dorothy Tse, Lucia Privitera, Anna C Norton, Francesco Gobbo, Patrick Spooner, Tomonori Takeuchi, Stephen J Martin, Richard G M Morris

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The how and why for multiple forms of hippocampal LTP.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  5. Modelling of What-Where-When Everyday Memories in Rats.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Oppositional and competitive instigation of hippocampal synaptic plasticity by the VTA and locus coeruleus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Light-exercise-induced dopaminergic and noradrenergic stimulation in the dorsal hippocampus: Using a rat physiological exercise model.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. To update or to create? The influence of novelty and prior knowledge on memory networks.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Interplay of hippocampal long-term potentiation and long-term depression in enabling memory representations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. A locus coeruleus to dorsal hippocampus pathway mediates cue-induced reinstatement of opioid self-administration in male and female rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Dorothy Tse *Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom.
Lucia Privitera *Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom.
Anna C NortonCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom.
Francesco GobboCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8331-929X
Patrick SpoonerCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom.
Tomonori TakeuchiDanish Research Institute of Translational Neuroscience, Nordic-European Molecular Biology Laboratory Partnership for Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9981-4260
Stephen J MartinSchool of Systems Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, United Kingdom.
Richard G M MorrisCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8661-1520
University of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBAarhus University · DKEdge Hill University · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 207481/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory formation is typically divided into phases associated with encoding, storage, consolidation, and retrieval. The neural determinants of these phases are thought to differ. This study first investigated the impact of the experience of novelty in rats incurred at a different time, before or after, the precise moment of memory encoding. Memory retention was enhanced. Optogenetic activation of the locus coeruleus mimicked this enhancement induced by novelty, both when given before and after the moment of encoding. Optogenetic activation of the locus coeruleus also induced a slow-onset potentiation of field potentials in area CA1 of the hippocampus evoked by CA3 stimulation. Despite the locus coeruleus being considered a primarily noradrenergic area, both effects of such stimulation were blocked by the dopamine D1/D5 receptor antagonist SCH 23390. These findings substantiate and enrich the evidence implicating the locus coeruleus in cellular aspects of memory consolidation in hippocampus.

Indexed as

Locus CoeruleusOptogeneticsAnimalsHippocampusLong-Term PotentiationNeuronsNorepinephrineRatsNorepinephrinedopaminelocus coeruleuslong term potentiationmemorysynaptic tagging and capture

Identifiers

PMID37931094
PMCPMC10655220
OpenAlexW4388406901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.