Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37930998›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

An English-Language adaptation and validation of the Justice Sensitivity Short Scales-8 (JSS-8).

Katharina Groskurth, Constanze Beierlein, Désirée Nießen, Anna Baumert, Beatrice Rammstedt, Clemens M Lechner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 74% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katharina GroskurthDepartment of Survey Design and Methodology, GESIS-Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5933-5380
Constanze BeierleinDepartment Hamm 2, Hamm-Lippstadt University of Applied Sciences, Hamm, Germany.
Désirée NießenDepartment of Survey Design and Methodology, GESIS-Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8652-5603
Anna BaumertInstitute for Psychology, School of Human and Social Sciences, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
Beatrice RammstedtDepartment of Survey Design and Methodology, GESIS-Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany.
Clemens M LechnerDepartment of Survey Design and Methodology, GESIS-Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3053-8701
GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences · DEHamm-Lippstadt University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversity of Wuppertal · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The construct of justice sensitivity has four perspectives that capture individual differences in the strength of reactions to injustice when becoming a victim of injustice (victim sensitivity), when witnessing injustice as an outsider (observer sensitivity), when passively benefitting from an injustice done to others (beneficiary sensitivity), or when committing an injustice (perpetrator sensitivity). Individual differences in these four justice sensitivity perspectives are highly relevant in moral research. With just eight items in total, the Justice Sensitivity Short Scales-8 (JSS-8) are a very efficient way to measure the four perspectives. JSS-8 was initially constructed in German (Ungerechtigkeitssensibilität-Skalen-8, USS-8) and later translated into English. In the present study, we empirically validated this English-language adaptation in a heterogeneous quota sample from the UK. The results show that the psychometric properties (i.e., reliability, validity, standardization) of JSS-8 are good, and that they are comparable with those of the German-language source version. Because of the invariance of loadings, intercepts, and residual variances, researchers can compare manifest scale statistics (i.e., means, variances) of JSS-8 across the UK and Germany. JSS-8 is thus particularly suitable for measuring justice sensitivity in various research areas with constraints on assessment time and questionnaire space.

Indexed as

IndividualityLanguagePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSocial JusticeSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37930998
PMCPMC10627457
OpenAlexW4388408733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.