Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37930990›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Marsh migration and beyond: A scalable framework to assess tidal wetland resilience and support strategic management.

Rachel A Stevens, Suzanne Shull, Jamie Carter, Emily Bishop, Nate Herold, Cory A Riley, Kerstin Wasson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachel A StevensGreat Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, New Hampshire Fish and Game Department, Greenland, New Hampshire, United States of America.
Suzanne ShullPadilla Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, Mount Vernon, Washington, United States of America.
Jamie CarterOffice for Coastal Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Portland, Maine, United States of America.
Emily BishopWestward Ecology, Port Townsend, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3989-8826
Nate HeroldOffice for Coastal Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America.
Cory A RileyGreat Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, New Hampshire Fish and Game Department, Greenland, New Hampshire, United States of America.
Kerstin WassonElkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Watsonville, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1858-4505

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tidal wetlands are critical but highly threatened ecosystems that provide vital services. Efficient stewardship of tidal wetlands requires robust comparative assessments of different marshes to understand their resilience to stressors, particularly in the face of relative sea level rise. Existing assessment frameworks aim to address tidal marsh resilience, but many are either too localized or too general, and few directly translate resilience evaluations to recommendations for management strategies. In response to the deficiencies in existing frameworks, we identified a set of metrics that influence overall marsh resilience that can be assessed at any spatial scale. We then developed a new comprehensive assessment framework to rank relative marsh resilience using these metrics, which are nested within three categories. We represent resilience as the sum of results across the three metric categories: current condition, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability. Users of this framework can add scores from each category to generate a total resilience score to compare across marshes or take the score from each category and refer to recommended management actions we developed based on expert elicitation for each combination of category results. We then applied the framework across the contiguous United States using publicly available data, and summarized results at multiple spatial scales, from regions to coastal states to National Estuarine Research Reserves to finer scale marsh units, to demonstrate the framework's value across these scales. Our national analysis allowed for comparison of tidal marsh resilience across geographies, which is valuable for determining where to prioritize management actions for desired future marsh conditions. In combination, the assessment framework and recommended management actions function as a broadly applicable decision-support tool that will enable resource managers to evaluate tidal marshes and select appropriate strategies for conservation, restoration, and other stewardship goals.

Indexed as

EcosystemWetlandsGeographySea Level RiseUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37930990
PMCPMC10627444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.