Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37930971›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Women's lived experience of endometriosis-related fertility issues.

Elodie Girard, Anna Mazloum, Isabelle Navarria-Forney, Nicola Pluchino, Isabelle Streuli, Christine Cedraschi

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Women's Causal Beliefs About Their Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elodie GirardDivision of Liaison Psychiatry and Crisis Intervention, Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Anna MazloumDivision of Liaison Psychiatry and Crisis Intervention, Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Isabelle Navarria-ForneyPrivate Practice, Centre Médical de Lancy, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nicola PluchinoDivision of Gynaecology, Lausanne University Hospitals and the Faculty of Medicine of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Isabelle StreuliDivision of Gynaecology, Reproductive Medicine Unit, Geneva University Hospitals and the Faculty of Medicine of University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8767-0039
Christine CedraschiDivision of General Medical Rehabilitation, Department of Geriatrics and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the present study is to conduct a qualitative investigation to provide a deeper understanding of women's views about endometriosis, fertility and their perception of reproductive options.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted by two female psychiatrists, specialized in gynecology and obstetrical consultation-liaison psychiatry, trained in qualitative procedures, with experience in qualitative studies and in psychological support of women attending infertility consultations. No prior relationship with respondents was established before data collection. Interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed. Interviews lasted 45-75 minutes. The transcripts were then analysed using thematic content analysis.

resultsTwenty-nine women were contacted. Twelve agreed to an interview at the hospital's infertility clinic. Eleven women with diverse sociodemographic characteristics were included. The key findings of thematic content analysis can be grouped into four topics: (1) Diagnostic announcement and initial delay; (2) Negative perceptions of initial care: pre-diagnosis phase; (3) Struggle with endometriosis and its treatment; (4) Issues related to health problems, fertility and reproductive options.

conclusionOur analysis of the interviews corroborates the distressing impact of the trivialization of pain and the uncertainty of or the long quest for diagnosis. The findings also stress various associated issues, from the diagnostic delay to the low success rates of fertility treatments. This qualitative analysis contributes to better understand the accumulation of negative emotions within the illness trajectory and the poor dyadic adjustment within the couple.

Indexed as

EndometriosisGynecologyInfertility, FemaleDelayed DiagnosisFemaleHumansPainQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID37930971
PMCPMC10627452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.