Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37930865›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental immunology2024

Tuning the potency and selectivity of ImmTAC molecules by affinity modulation.

Ian B Robertson, Rachel Mulvaney, Nele Dieckmann, Alessio Vantellini, Martina Canestraro, Francesca Amicarella, Ronan O'Dwyer, David K Cole, Stephen Harper, Omer Dushek and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cancer immunotherapy by γδ T cells.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ian B RobertsonImmunocore Limited, Drug Discovery and Protein Engineering, Abingdon, Oxon, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9917-4147
Rachel MulvaneyImmunocore Limited, Drug Discovery and Protein Engineering, Abingdon, Oxon, UK.
Nele DieckmannImmunocore Limited, Drug Discovery and Protein Engineering, Abingdon, Oxon, UK.
Alessio VantelliniImmunocore Limited, Drug Discovery and Protein Engineering, Abingdon, Oxon, UK.
Martina CanestraroImmunocore Limited, Drug Discovery and Protein Engineering, Abingdon, Oxon, UK.
Francesca AmicarellaImmunocore Limited, Drug Discovery and Protein Engineering, Abingdon, Oxon, UK.
Ronan O'DwyerImmunocore Limited, Drug Discovery and Protein Engineering, Abingdon, Oxon, UK.
David K ColeImmunocore Limited, Drug Discovery and Protein Engineering, Abingdon, Oxon, UK.
Stephen HarperImmunocore Limited, Drug Discovery and Protein Engineering, Abingdon, Oxon, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6029-8668
Omer DushekSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Peter KirkImmunocore Limited, Drug Discovery and Protein Engineering, Abingdon, Oxon, UK.
Immunocore (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Immunocore Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T-cell-engaging bispecifics have great clinical potential for the treatment of cancer and infectious diseases. The binding affinity and kinetics of a bispecific molecule for both target and T-cell CD3 have substantial effects on potency and specificity, but the rules governing these relationships are not fully understood. Using immune mobilizing monoclonal TCRs against cancer (ImmTAC) molecules as a model, we explored the impact of altering affinity for target and CD3 on the potency and specificity of the redirected T-cell response. This class of bispecifics binds specific target peptides presented by human leukocyte antigen on the cell surface via an affinity-enhanced T-cell receptor and can redirect T-cell activation with an anti-CD3 effector moiety. The data reveal that combining a strong affinity TCR with an intermediate affinity anti-CD3 results in optimal T-cell activation, while strong affinity of both targeting and effector domains significantly reduces maximum cytokine release. Moreover, by optimizing the affinity of both parts of the molecule, it is possible to improve the selectivity. These results could be effectively modelled based on kinetic proofreading with limited signalling. This model explained the experimental observation that strong binding at both ends of the molecules leads to reduced activity, through very stable target-bispecific-effector complexes leading to CD3 entering a non-signalling dark state. These findings have important implications for the design of anti-CD3-based bispecifics with optimal biophysical parameters for both activity and specificity.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificNeoplasmsCD3 ComplexCytokinesHumansReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-LymphocytesAntibodies, BispecificCD3 ComplexCytokinesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cellbispecificcluster of differentiation 3cytokine releasecytotoxicityT-cell activation

Identifiers

PMID37930865
PMCPMC10847821
OpenAlexW4388425206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.