Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37930808›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2023

Causal roles of prefrontal and temporo-parietal theta oscillations for inequity aversion.

Patricia Christian, Georgia E Kapetaniou, Alexander Soutschek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tipping the balance between fairness and efficiency through temporoparietal stimulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patricia ChristianDepartment of Psychology, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8096-0535
Georgia E KapetaniouDepartment of Psychology, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander SoutschekDepartment of Psychology, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8438-7721

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SO 1636/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The right temporo-parietal junction (rTPJ) and the right lateral prefrontal cortex (rLPFC) are known to play prominent roles in human social behaviour. However, it remains unknown which brain rhythms in these regions contribute to trading-off fairness norms against selfish interests as well as whether the influence of these oscillations depends on whether fairness violations are advantageous or disadvantageous for a decision maker. To answer these questions, we used non-invasive transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to determine which brain rhythms in rTPJ and rLPFC are causally involved in moderating aversion to advantageous and disadvantageous inequity. Our results show that theta oscillations in rTPJ strengthen the aversion to unequal splits, which is statistically mediated by the rTPJ's role for perspective taking. In contrast, theta tACS over rLPFC enhanced the preference for outcome-maximizing unequal choices more strongly for disadvantageous compared to advantageous outcome distributions. Taken together, we provide evidence that neural oscillations in rTPJ and rLPFC have distinct causal roles in implementing inequity aversion, which can be explained by their involvement in distinct psychological processes.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorTranscranial Direct Current StimulationHumansPrefrontal Cortexequitylateral prefrontal cortexperspective takingsocial decision makingtemporo-parietal junctiontranscranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

Identifiers

PMID37930808
PMCPMC10642380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.