Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37930777›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2023

Single-use negative pressure wound therapy to prevent surgical site complications in high-risk patients undergoing caesarean sections: a real-world study.

Mendinaro Imcha, Nyan Chin Liew, Arthur McNally, Davor Zibar, Mairead O'Riordan, Aoife Currie, Tim Styche, Jacqui Hughes, Catherine Whittall

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mendinaro ImchaObstetrics and Gynaecology, Limerick University Maternity Hospital, Ennis Road, Limerick V94 C566, Republic of Ireland.
Nyan Chin LiewObstetrics and Gynaecology, Limerick University Maternity Hospital, Ennis Road, Limerick V94 C566, Republic of Ireland.
Arthur McNallyObstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Jubilee Maternity Hospital, 274 Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK.
Davor ZibarObstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Hospital Galway, Newcastle Road, Galway H91 YR71, Republic of Ireland.
Mairead O'RiordanObstetrics and Gynaecology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Wilton Road, Cork T12 YE02, Republic of Ireland.
Aoife CurrieObstetrics and Gynaecology, Craigavon Area Hospital, 68 Lurgan Road, Craigavon BT63 5QQ, Northern Ireland.
Tim StycheGlobal HEOR, Smith & Nephew, 101 Hessle Road, Hull HU3 2BN, UK.
Jacqui HughesGlobal HEOR, Smith & Nephew, 101 Hessle Road, Hull HU3 2BN, UK.
Catherine WhittallGlobal HEOR, Smith & Nephew, 101 Hessle Road, Hull HU3 2BN, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4859-4293
Smith & Nephew (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity Maternity Hospital Limerick · IECork University Hospital · IERoyal Jubilee Maternity Services · GBUniversity Hospital Galway · IE

Funding

Smith and Nephew
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical site complications (SSCs), including surgical site infection (SSI), are common following C-sections. Management of the post-operative incision with single-use negative pressure wound therapy (sNPWT) has been shown to reduce the risk of SSC in high-risk individuals. This study explored the outcomes of routine, real-world use of sNPWT in high-risk patients undergoing C-sections. An observational, retrospective in-service evaluation was conducted across eight obstetric centres in the Republic and Northern Ireland. Patients undergoing C-sections were stratified for their risk of developing SSC using commonly known risk factors, including BMI ≥30, smoking, diabetes, and whether the patients had undergone previous C-sections or had a previous history of wound dehiscence. Those at high-risk were treated with sNPWT post-operatively. Data relating to any SSC that developed post-operatively, for up to 30 days, were captured. Data were compared with original research previously published by Wloch et al. (2012). Of 1111 women considered high-risk, 106 (9.5%) went on to develop SSCs, predominantly superficial SSIs. SSCs were associated with extra visits with their general practitioner (GP), outpatient visits, or inpatient hospital stays in 5.7%, 2.4%, and 1.7% of the entire cohort, representing 59.4%, 25.5%, and 17.9% of the 106 patients with SSC. Patients needed on average 1.8 extra GP visits and 0.7 extra outpatient visits. Patients who needed to be readmitted to hospital had an average length of stay of 4 days. In comparison with a previously published cohort, in which sNPWT was not used, we observed a significant reduction in the incidence of SSCs across BMI groups 18.5-24.9 (P = 0.02), 25-29.9 (P = 0.003), and ≥35 kg/m2 (P = 0.04). In those patients who had undergone at least one previous C-section, the rates of complications also reduced (P = 0.006). This analysis provides further justification for using sNPWT to manage surgical incisions in patients considered at high risk of developing post-procedural SSCs, particularly those with a BMI ≥30 or a history of more than one C-section.

Indexed as

General PractitionersNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyCesarean SectionFemaleHumansInpatientsPregnancyRetrospective Studiescaesarean sectionnegative pressure wound therapysurgical site infectionwound-related complications

Identifiers

PMID37930777
PMCPMC10627297
OpenAlexW4388423781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.