Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37930699›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Parents' Views on Autopsy, Organ Donation, and Research Donation After Neonatal Death.

Elizabeth E Crouch, Carlos Damas, William C Bartrug, Anne Shamiyeh, Meghan Scelfo, Madeleine Dreyfus, Dawn Gano, Summer Segal, Linda S Franck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth E CrouchDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco.
Carlos DamasDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco.
William C BartrugDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco.
Anne ShamiyehHelping After Neonatal Death of the Bay Area, Redwood City, California.
Meghan ScelfoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco.
Madeleine DreyfusDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco.
Dawn GanoDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Neurology, Benioff Children's Hospital, University of California San Francisco.
Summer SegalDepartment of Pediatrics, Stad Center for Pain Palliative and Integrative Medicine, University of California San Francisco.
Linda S FranckSchool of Nursing, University of California San Francisco.
University of California, San Francisco · USUCSF Benioff Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Parents who experience neonatal loss have the option to participate in autopsy, organ donation, and research donation. However, clinicians are uncomfortable discussing autopsy and may not be aware of research and organ donation opportunities. Objective: To capture the perspectives of parents who had experienced neonatal loss about autopsy, organ donation, and research donation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study used virtual focus groups with parents who attended a local bereavement support group in the US. Participants were recruited from Helping After Neonatal Death, a support group with a local chapter. Participants self-selected from an email request if they met the following criteria: aged 18 years or older, English speaking, at least 6 months elapsed since neonatal death, and access to a video conference device with internet. Focus groups took place between April and September 2021. The recorded sessions were analyzed using a grounded theory-informed approach by the research team that included parents with experience of neonatal loss. Data were analyzed from December 2021 through December 2022. Results: A total of 14 mothers engaged in the focus group; 9 (75%) were aged 30 to 39 years, and 8 (66%) were White. The mothers were overall well educated. The first main theme grew from the lived experience of neonatal loss, specifically the importance of offering all parents the option to donate, rather than prejudging who would or would not be interested. Parents of neonates who die have few opportunities to parent that child and make loving decisions for them. Participants emphasized that the conversation about autopsy, organ donation, and research donation, albeit difficult, can offer a meaningful parenting experience. A second main theme that emerged related to how organ or tissue donation could provide additional meaning to a child's life. These choices contributed to building a legacy to honor their child's memory, which also helped with grief and coping with their loss. A third theme included recommendations to clinicians and health systems for improving communication, including written information for parents and communication training for health care professionals. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study, parents who experienced neonatal loss endorsed the importance of offering parents the choice of autopsy, organ donation, or research donation with skillful and empathetic communication. They provided practical recommendations to improve communication and empower families.

Indexed as

Perinatal DeathTissue and Organ ProcurementAutopsyChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMothersParents

Identifiers

PMID37930699
PMCPMC10628732
OpenAlexW4388423412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.