Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37930536›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Protein-Protein Interaction: Tandem Affinity Purification in Bacteria.

Julie P M Viala, Emmanuelle Bouveret

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julie P M VialaLaboratoire d'Ingénierie des Systèmes Macromoléculaires (UMR 7255), Institut de Microbiologie de la Méditerranée, Aix-Marseille Univ., CNRS, Marseille, France. jviala@imm.cnrs.fr.
Emmanuelle BouveretInstitut Pasteur, Department of Microbiology, Unit Stress, Adaptation and Metabolism in enterobacteria, Université Paris Cité, UMR CNRS 6047, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of protein-protein interaction networks can lead to the unveiling of protein complex(es) forming cellular machinerie(s) or reveal component proteins of a specific cellular pathway. Deciphering protein-protein interaction networks therefore contributes to a deeper understanding of how cells function. Here we describe the protocol to perform tandem affinity purification (TAP) in bacteria, which enables the identification of the partners of a bait protein under native conditions. This method consists in two sequential steps of affinity purification using two different tags. For that purpose, the bait protein is translationally fused to the TAP tag, which consists of a calmodulin-binding peptide (CBP) and two immunoglobulin G (IgG)-binding domains of Staphylococcus aureus protein A (ProtA) that are separated by the tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease cleavage site. After the first round of purification based on the binding of ProtA to IgG-coated beads, TEV protease cleavage releases CBP-tagged bait protein along with its partners for a second round of purification on calmodulin affinity resin and leaves behind protein contaminants bound to IgG. Creating the TAP-tag translational fusion at the chromosomal locus allows detection of protein interactions occurring in physiological conditions.

Indexed as

CalmodulinTandem Affinity PurificationBacteriaChromatography, AffinityImmunoglobulin GCalmodulinImmunoglobulin GAffinity purificationCalmodulin-binding peptide (CBP)Escherichia coliProtein A (ProtA)Protein complexProtein–protein interactionSalmonellaTandem affinity purification (TAP)Tobacco etch virus (TEV)

Identifiers

PMID37930536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.