ArticleMolecular biotechnology2024
Investigating the Molecular Interactions of Quinoline Derivatives for Antibacterial Activity Against Bacillus subtilis: Computational Biology and In Vitro Study Interpretations.
Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial infections are evolving and one of the chief problems is emergence and prevalence of antibacterial resistance. Moreover, certain strains of Bacillus subtilis have become resistant to several antibiotics. To counteract this menace, the present work aimed to comprehend the antibacterial activity of synthesized two quinoline derivatives against Bacillus subtilis. Toxicity predictions via Protox II, SwissADME and T.E.S.T (Toxicity Estimation Software Tool) revealed that these derivatives were non-toxic and had little to no adverse effects. Molecular docking studies carried out in Schrodinger with two quinoline derivatives (referred Q1 and Q2) docked against selected target proteins (PDB IDs: 2VAM and1FSE) of B. subtilis demonstrated ideal binding energies (2VAM-Q1: - 4.63 kcal/mol and 2VAM-Q2: - 4.46 kcal/mol, and 1FSE-Q1: - 3.51 kcal/mol, 1FSE-Q2: - 6.34 kcal/mol). These complexes were simulated at 100 ns and the outcomes revealed their stability with slight conformational changes. Anti-microbial assay via disc diffusion method revealed zones of inhibition showing that B. subtilis was inhibited by both Q1 and Q2, with Q2 performing slightly better than Q1, pointing towards its effectiveness against this organism and necessitating further study on other bacteria in prospective studies. Thus, this study demonstrates that our novel quinoline derivatives exhibit antibacterial properties against Bacillus subtilis and can act as potent anti-bacterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37930509What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.