Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37930386›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Outcomes of cochlear implantation in Usher syndrome: a systematic review.

Hannah Louisa Cornwall, Chon Meng Lam, Daoud Chaudhry, Jameel Muzaffar, Peter Monksfield, Manohar L Bance

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah Louisa Cornwall *Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7647-9503
Chon Meng Lam *Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6037-6558
Daoud ChaudhryCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Jameel MuzaffarDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Level 3, A BlockCambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 165, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3065-0269
Peter MonksfieldDepartment of Otolaryngology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7343-7105
Manohar L BanceDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Level 3, A BlockCambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 165, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. mlb59@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8050-3617
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study is a systematic review of the literature which seeks to evaluate auditory and quality of life (QOL) outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with Usher syndrome.

methodsSystematic review of studies indexed in Medline via PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov was performed up to March 9th 2022, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Patient demographics, comorbidity, details of cochlear implantation, auditory, and QOL outcomes were extracted and summarized.

results33 studies reported over 217 cochlear implants in 187 patients with Usher syndrome, comprising subtypes 1 (56 patients), 2 (9 patients), 3 (23 patients), and not specified (99 patients). Auditory outcomes included improved sound detection, speech perception, and speech intelligibility. QOL outcomes were reported for 75 patients, with benefit reported in the majority.

conclusionsMany patients with Usher syndrome develop improved auditory outcomes after cochlear implantation with early implantation being an important factor.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationQuality of LifeUsher SyndromesCochlear ImplantsHumansSpeech PerceptionTreatment OutcomeCochlear implantHearing lossQuality of lifeUsher syndrome

Identifiers

PMID37930386
PMCPMC10858075
OpenAlexW4388422769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.