Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37930351›Full record

ArticleSleep2024

A two-process model of Drosophila sleep reveals an inter-dependence between circadian clock speed and the rate of sleep pressure decay.

Lakshman Abhilash, Orie Thomas Shafer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Invertebrate brains as diversified models for understanding sleep mechanisms and function.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Inferring the genetic basis of sleep states inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Current Evidence for Sleep States inCurrent sleep medicine reports · 2026
    Review
  6. The use ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  7. Sleep regulation inFrontiers in neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. 25 years ofFly · 2025
    Review
  11. Recognition of distinct sleep states inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. eNeuro · 2025
    Article
  14. Bimodal Patterns of Locomotor Activity and Sleep inNature and science of sleep · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lakshman AbhilashThe Advanced Science Research Center, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Orie Thomas ShaferThe Advanced Science Research Center, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7177-743X
The Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

Network Properties of Circadian Clock Modulation and EntrainmentR01NS077933 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ORIE T SHAFER · 2012 to 2026
$4.9M
Identification of Sleep Substances in the Brain Using Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass SpectrometryR21NS131939 · NINDS · ADVANCED SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTER · PI SHAFER, ORIE T · 2023 to 2024
$432k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS077933NINDS NIH HHS R01NS077933NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS131939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep is controlled by two processes-a circadian clock that regulates its timing and a homeostat that regulates the drive to sleep. Drosophila has been an insightful model for understanding both processes. For four decades, Borbély and Daan's two-process model has provided a powerful framework for understanding sleep regulation. However, the field of fly sleep has not employed such a model as a framework for the investigation of sleep. To this end, we have adapted the two-process model to the fly and established its utility by showing that it can provide empirically testable predictions regarding the circadian and homeostatic control of fly sleep. We show that the ultradian rhythms previously reported for loss-of-function clock mutants in the fly are robustly detectable and a predictable consequence of a functional sleep homeostat in the absence of a functioning circadian system. We find that a model in which the circadian clock speed and homeostatic rates act without influencing each other provides imprecise predictions regarding how clock speed influences the strength of sleep rhythms and the amount of daily sleep. We also find that quantitatively good fits between empirical values and model predictions were achieved only when clock speeds were positively correlated with rates of decay of sleep pressure. Our results indicate that longer sleep bouts better reflect the homeostatic process than the current definition of sleep as any inactivity lasting 5 minutes or more. This two-process model represents a powerful framework for work on the molecular and physiological regulation of fly sleep.

Indexed as

Circadian ClocksDrosophila ProteinsAnimalsCircadian RhythmDrosophilaSleepDrosophila ProteinscircadianDrosophilafree-running periodsleepsleep homeostattwo-process modelultradian rhythms

Identifiers

PMID37930351
PMCPMC11275470
OpenAlexW4388411001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.