ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2023
Changes in fungal taxonomy: mycological rationale and clinical implications.
Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial architects of cigar fermentation: a critical review of beneficial roles in quality enhancement and detrimental potential for mould spoilage.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- The repertoire of yeast species from human clinical samples in the United Kingdom 2016-2022: epidemiology, clinical relevance, and fluconazole resistance.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- WHO Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS) for monitoring bloodstream infections due toEClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Vulvovaginal candidiasis among Yemeni women: prevalence of Candida species, biofilm formation rates, antifungal susceptibility patterns, and biofilm-associated genes ALS1 and HWP1.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Chromosome-level assembly and phylophenetic insights of Cladosporium oxysporum A3.I.1, a fungus with the ability to degrade polyurethane polymers.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Review
- An update on clinically relevant, rare, and emergingClinical microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Review
- Name changes for fungi of medical importance, 2022-2024.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025Review
- Glycan microarray analysis ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Leveraging synthetic genetic array screening to identify therapeutic targets and inhibitors for combatting azole resistance inMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Role of Fungi in Tumorigenesis: Promises and Challenges.Annual review of pathology · 2025Review
- Can whole genome sequencing resolve taxonomic ambiguities in fungi? The case study ofFrontiers in fungal biology · 2025Article
- Emerging human cases of sporotrichosis associated with feline outbreaks ofCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025Article
- Current taxonomic status of the cultivable and uncultivable Paracoccidioides species.Medical mycology · 2024Article
- The yeast genus Tardiomyces gen. nov. with one new species and two new combinations.Infection · 2024Article
- Systemic Mycoses by Novel Onygenalean Fungal PathogensOpen forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Formic acid sandwich method is well-suited for filamentous fungi identification and improves turn around time using Zybio EXS2600 mass spectrometry.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Review
- What do We Know about Cryptic Aspergillosis?Microorganisms · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous fungal species of medical importance have been recently subjected to and will likely continue to undergo nomenclatural changes as a result of the application of molecular approaches to fungal classification together with abandonment of dual nomenclature. Here, we summarize those changes affecting key groups of fungi of medical importance, explaining the mycological (taxonomic) rationale that underpinned the changes and the clinical relevance/importance (where such exists) of the key nomenclatural revisions. Potential mechanisms to mitigate unnecessary taxonomic instability are suggested, together with approaches to raise awareness of important changes to minimize potential clinical confusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.