Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37930113›Full record

SynthesisJournal of veterinary internal medicine

Vaccination for the prevention of equine herpesvirus-1 disease in domesticated horses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Klaus Osterrieder, David C Dorman, Brandy A Burgess, Lutz S Goehring, Peggy Gross, Claire Neinast, Nicola Pusterla, Gisela Soboll Hussey, David P Lunn

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Updated ACVIM consensus statement on equine herpesvirus-1.Journal of veterinary internal medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Klaus OsterriederInstitut für Virologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5313-2176
David C DormanCollege of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8270-6215
Brandy A BurgessCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8580-3395
Lutz S GoehringCollege of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Kentucky, Maxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Peggy GrossCollege of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7906-9267
Claire NeinastCollege of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Nicola PusterlaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Gisela Soboll HusseyCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, Veterinary Medical Center, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
David P LunnSchool of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7388-9766
North Carolina State University · USFreie Universität Berlin · DEMichigan State University · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEquine herpes virus type 1 (EHV-1) infection in horses is associated with respiratory and neurologic disease, abortion, and neonatal death. HYPOTHESIS: Vaccines decrease the occurrence of clinical disease in EHV-1-infected horses.

methodsA systematic review was performed searching multiple databases to identify relevant studies. Selection criteria were original peer-reviewed research reports that investigated the in vivo use of vaccines for the prevention of disease caused by EHV-1 in domesticated horses. Main outcomes of interest included pyrexia, abortion, neurologic disease, viremia, and nasal shedding. We evaluated risk of bias, conducted exploratory meta-analyses of incidence data for the main outcomes, and performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for each vaccine subtype.

resultsA total of 1018 unique studies were identified, of which 35 met the inclusion criteria. Experimental studies accounted for 31/35 studies, with the remainder being observational studies. Eight vaccine subclasses were identified including commercial (modified-live, inactivated, mixed) and experimental (modified-live, inactivated, deletion mutant, DNA, recombinant). Risk of bias was generally moderate, often because of underreporting of research methods, and sample sizes were small leading to imprecision in the estimate of the effect size. Several studies reported either no benefit or minimal vaccine efficacy for the primary outcomes of interest. Meta-analyses revealed significant heterogeneity was present, and our confidence in the quality of evidence for most outcomes was low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Our review indicates that commercial and experimental vaccines minimally reduce the incidence of clinical disease associated with EHV-1 infection.

Indexed as

Herpesviridae InfectionsHerpesvirus 1, EquidHorse DiseasesAnimalsHerpesvirus VaccinesHorsesVaccinationViral VaccinesHerpesvirus VaccinesViral Vaccinesequineequine herpesvirus‐1 (EHV‐1)equine herpesvirus myeloencephalopathy (EHM)vaccination

Identifiers

PMID37930113
PMCPMC11099739
OpenAlexW4388422545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.