ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2023
FLED: a full-length eccDNA detector for long-reads sequencing data.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extrachromosomal DNA in urothelial carcinoma: mechanisms and clinical applications.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Identification of Extrachromosomal Circular DNA Isolated from Cell Culture Supernatant and Its Potential Applications for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
- Adaptive dynamics of extrachromosomal circular DNA in rice under nutrient stress.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Review
- Chromothripsis in cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025Review
- HyenaCircle: a HyenaDNA-based pretrained large language model for long eccDNA prediction.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Review
- Extrachromosomal DNA in cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2024Review
- eccDNA-pipe: an integrated pipeline for identification, analysis and visualization of extrachromosomal circular DNA from high-throughput sequencing data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Reconstructing the full-length sequence of extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA) from short sequencing reads has proved challenging given the similarity of eccDNAs and their corresponding linear DNAs. Previous sequencing methods were unable to achieve high-throughput detection of full-length eccDNAs. Herein, a novel algorithm was developed, called Full-Length eccDNA Detection (FLED), to reconstruct the sequence of eccDNAs based on the strategy that combined rolling circle amplification and nanopore long-reads sequencing technology. Seven human epithelial and cancer cell line samples were analyzed by FLED and over 5000 full-length eccDNAs were identified per sample. The structures of identified eccDNAs were validated by both Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and Sanger sequencing. Compared to other published nanopore-based eccDNA detectors, FLED exhibited higher sensitivity. In cancer cell lines, the genes overlapped with eccDNA regions were enriched in cancer-related pathways and cis-regulatory elements can be predicted in the upstream or downstream of intact genes on eccDNA molecules, and the expressions of these cancer-related genes were dysregulated in tumor cell lines, indicating the regulatory potency of eccDNAs in biological processes. The proposed method takes advantage of nanopore long reads and enables unbiased reconstruction of full-length eccDNA sequences. FLED is implemented using Python3 which is freely available on GitHub (https://github.com/FuyuLi/FLED).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.