Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37930029›Full record

SynthesisBriefings in bioinformatics2023

Automated and reproducible cell identification in mass cytometry using neural networks.

Hajar Saihi, Conrad Bessant, William Alazawi

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hajar SaihiCentre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Barts and the London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1236-4728
Conrad BessantDigital Environment Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
William AlazawiCentre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Barts and the London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The principal use of mass cytometry is to identify distinct cell types and changes in their composition, phenotype and function in different samples and conditions. Combining data from different studies has the potential to increase the power of these discoveries in diverse fields such as immunology, oncology and infection. However, current tools are lacking in scalable, reproducible and automated methods to integrate and study data sets from mass cytometry that often use heterogenous approaches to study similar samples. To address these limitations, we present two novel developments: (1) a pre-trained cell identification model named Immunopred that allows automated identification of immune cells without user-defined prior knowledge of expected cell types and (2) a fully automated cytometry meta-analysis pipeline built around Immunopred. We evaluated this pipeline on six COVID-19 study data sets comprising 270 unique samples and uncovered novel significant phenotypic changes in the wider immune landscape of COVID-19 that were not identified when each study was analyzed individually. Applied widely, our approach will support the discovery of novel findings in research areas where cytometry data sets are available for integration.

Indexed as

COVID-19Neural Networks, ComputerFlow CytometryHumansPhenotypeimmunologymachine learningmass cytometrysingle-cells

Identifiers

PMID37930029
PMCPMC10630086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.