Parasite assemblages in volatile host stocks: inter- and intra-cohort variability restrict their value as biological tags for squid stock assessment.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

1. "Not flying solo": phylogenetic identification and life-cycle insights of larval cestodes in the European flying squidInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
   Article
2. Nematode Infections in Commercially Important Squid Species: Distribution Patterns and Food Safety Issues.Zoonoses and public health · 2025
   Article
3. Challenges for assessment of cohabiting stocks of argentine shortfin squidInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as