Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37929269›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

A Retrospective Comparison of Toxicity, Response and Survival of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Versus Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Rectal Carcinoma.

Georgios Kouklidis, Manolis Nikolopoulos, Omer Ahmed, Boulos Eskander, Ben Masters

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Colorectal Cancer: Risk Factors, Novel Approaches in Molecular Screening and Treatment.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Colorectal Cancer; Novel Approaches in Chimeric Antigen Receptors (CAR) -T cell.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Georgios KouklidisOrthopaedics, University Hospitals Dorset, NHS (National Health Service) UK, Poole, GBR.
Manolis NikolopoulosGynae-oncology, University Hospitals Dorset, NHS (National Health Service) UK, Poole, GBR.
Omer AhmedOrthopaedics, University Hospitals Dorset, NHS (National Health Service) UK, Poole, GBR.
Boulos EskanderPsychiatry, Dorset Healthcare University, NHS (National Health Service) UK, Poole, GBR.
Ben MastersOncology, University Hospitals Dorset, NHS (National Health Service) UK, Poole, GBR.
Dorset HealthCare University NHS Foundation Trust · GBNational Health Service · GBPoole Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe main target of neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer is to downstage and downsize large tumours to increase the chance of complete surgical resection, and therefore decrease the chances of local recurrence. With or without the addition of chemotherapy, until recently, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) used to be the radiotherapy treatment modality of choice. However, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is being increasingly adopted by many radiotherapy centres as a more modern, conformal technique due to its ability to minimize radiation dose to nearby organs. The aim of our analysis was to assess the difference in toxicity, response to treatment, and survival between the patients treated with these two different treatment modalities in our institution.

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of data and compared two groups of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who were treated with either 3D-CRT or IMRT. The main outcomes were radiation toxicity and response to treatment. Overall survival was a secondary outcome.

resultsOne hundred and thirty-six patients were included in the study: 71 patients treated with 3D-CRT and 65 patients treated with IMRT. With regard to toxicity, there was no significant difference between the groups for bladder and skin toxicity, but there was a significant reduction in acute grade 2 bowel toxicity in patients treated with a long course of IMRT [3D-CRT 77% (48/62) vs IMRT 64% (30/47) p=0.042]. There was no statistically significant difference in the treatment response rates of these two radiotherapy treatment modalities, as well as in overall survival between the groups (p=0.604).  Conclusion: Our study showed that IMRT can significantly reduce acute bowel side effects for patients undergoing neoadjuvant radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancers. Further studies are needed to confirm the clinical advantage of IMRT in rectal carcinoma.

Indexed as

pathological response raterectal cancersurvivalthree-dimensional conformal radiotherapytoxicity

Identifiers

PMID37929269
PMCPMC10620340
OpenAlexW4388229629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.