ArticleUltrasound (Leeds, England)2023
Combined clinical accuracy of inflammatory markers and ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Article in Ultrasound (Leeds, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of the HALP score and inflammatory biomarkers in differentiating complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a retrospective cohort study.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026Article
- Association of Sex, Age, and Inflammatory Cell Counts with Complicated Acute Appendicitis.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram based on C-reactive protein, neutrophil count, and respiratory rate for predicting complicated appendicitis in children.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Article
- Preoperative inflammatory markers in pediatric appendicitis: associations with disease severity, postoperative recovery, pain, and surgical outcomes.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acute appendicitis is traditionally a clinical diagnosis where there are a range of diagnostic accuracies reported. The role of ultrasound is to improve specificity and decrease negative appendicectomy rate. It is a simple, non-invasive, easily available technique.The purpose of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of an ultrasound in combination with total leukocyte count, neutrophil percentage and C-reactive protein in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Methods: This study includes consecutive sampling of suspected patients from January 2021 to February 2022 with the approval of the ethical and research committee. Clinical and personal demographics and characteristics of patients were collected, including age, gender, symptoms and clinical signs. Ultrasonographic findings of fluid-filled appendiceal diameter of more than 6 mm, periappendiceal echogenic mesentry and an appendicolith were primary positive features. Laboratory inflammatory markers of total leukocyte count, neutrophil percentage and C-reactive protein were also included. Results: A total of 250 patients were included with a mean age of 25 ± 9.79 years. Total leukocyte count showed the highest sensitivity (77.68%), followed by neutrophil percentage (69.96%), C-reactive protein (67.10%) and ultrasound (62.96%). While ultrasound had the best specificity (70.59%), it was followed by C-reactive protein and total leukocyte count (64.71%) and neutrophil percentage (58.82%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity (99% and 98%) increased significantly when all four tests were combined. Conclusions: Clinical assessment with laboratory inflammatory markers and ultrasound improves the early diagnosis of appendicitis and decreases the false-positive appendicitis diagnosis, hence saving surgeons' time and relieving patients from unnecessary appendicectomies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.