Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37929232›Full record

ArticlePediatric diabetes2023

School Nurse Confidence with Diabetes Devices in Relation to Diabetes Knowledge and Prior Training: A Study of Convergent Validity.

Christine A March, Amber Hill, Traci M Kazmerski, Linda Siminerio, Galen Switzer, Elizabeth Miller, Ingrid Libman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric diabetes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Barriers and Opportunities for Diabetes Medical Management Plan (DMMP) Implementation in Schools: A National Survey of School Nurses and Diabetes Providers.The Journal of school nursing : the official publication of the National Association of School Nurses · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christine A MarchDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Amber HillUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Traci M KazmerskiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Linda SiminerioDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Galen SwitzerDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Elizabeth MillerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Ingrid LibmanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001856 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI RAY, KRISTIN N, RUBIO, DORIS M · 2016 to 2025
$13.8M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The Diabetes Device Confidence Scale (DDCS) is a new scale designed to evaluate school nurse confidence with diabetes devices. We hypothesized that DDCS score would be associated with related constructs of school nurse diabetes knowledge, experience, and training. Research Design and Methods: In a cross-sectional study, we co-administered the DDCS and Diabetes Knowledge Test 2 (DKT2) questionnaires to school nurses in Pennsylvania. We summarized DDCS scores (range 1-5) descriptively. We evaluated the relationship between DKT2 percent score and DDCS mean score with the Spearman correlation coefficient. Simple linear regression examined school nurse characteristics as predictors of DDCS score. Results: A total of 271 completed surveys were received. Mean DDCS score was 3.16±0.94, indicating moderate confidence with devices overall. School nurses frequently reported low confidence in items representing specific skills, including suspending insulin delivery (40%), giving a manual bolus (42%), knowing when to calibrate a continuous glucose monitor (48%), changing an insulin pump site (54%), and setting a temporary basal rate (58%). Mean DKT2 score was 89.5±0.1%, which was weakly but not significantly correlated with DDCS score (r=0.12, p=0.06). Formal device training (p<0.001), assisting ≥5 students with diabetes devices in the past 5 years (p<0.01), and a student caseload between 1000-1500 students (p<0.001) were associated with higher mean DDCS score. Conclusions: DDCS score is related to prior training and experience, providing evidence for the scale's convergent validity. The DDCS may be a useful tool for assessing school nurse readiness to use devices and identify areas to enhance knowledge and practical skills.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInsulinStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesInsulinautomated insulin delivery systemsconfidencecontinuous glucose monitoringinsulin pumpschool healthtype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID37929232
PMCPMC10624001
OpenAlexW4321783383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.