Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37929181›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Fine-tuning CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in common bean (

Ramon de Koning, Hana Daryanavard, Joyce Garmyn, Raphaël Kiekens, Mary Esther Muyoka Toili, Geert Angenon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Metabolic engineering of hairy root cultures inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ramon de KoningResearch Group Plant Genetics, Department of Bioengineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Hana DaryanavardResearch Group Plant Genetics, Department of Bioengineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Joyce GarmynResearch Group Plant Genetics, Department of Bioengineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Raphaël KiekensResearch Group Plant Genetics, Department of Bioengineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Mary Esther Muyoka ToiliResearch Group Plant Genetics, Department of Bioengineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Geert AngenonResearch Group Plant Genetics, Department of Bioengineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stable transformation of common bean is a challenging and time-consuming process. Although CRISPR/Cas9 has revolutionized gene editing with its high efficiency and specificity, the performance of the system can be affected by multiple factors, such as sgRNA specificity and effectiveness, and the choice of promoter used to drive Cas9 expression. The use of a hairy root transformation system to initially check the efficiency of sgRNAs and the impact of different promoters could speed up this process and increase the chances of success. We initially tested three different transformation methods to induce hairy roots and selected a preferred method suitable for a variety of different common bean genotypes. This method involved inoculating a severed radicle with

Indexed as

CRISPRgene editinginDelphilegumesP. vulgarisRaffinose family oligosaccharides (RFO)R. rhizogenestransformation

Identifiers

PMID37929181
PMCPMC10623320
OpenAlexW4387811148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.