Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37929106›Full record

ArticleACS omega2023

Enhancing Graphitic Carbon Precursors from Coal Pyrolysis: A Comparative Analysis of Microwave Plasma and Conventional Thermal Upgradation Methods.

Akshay Gharpure, Randy L Vander Wal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akshay GharpureJohn and Willie Leone Family Deptartment of Energy and Mineral Engineering and the EMS Energy Institute, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8823-3949
Randy L Vander WalJohn and Willie Leone Family Deptartment of Energy and Mineral Engineering and the EMS Energy Institute, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5847-9726
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates and compares the efficacy of conventional thermal pyrolysis and microwave (MW) plasma pyrolysis in upgrading coal-derived precursors. Coal samples presenting a range of ranks were pyrolyzed under various reactive and nonreactive atmospheres using a pyroprobe, with the pyrolyzates analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Comparative MW plasma tests were conducted using a modified countertop MW unit, with condensed products similarly analyzed by GC-MS. A predominant coal devolatilization product-benzene was selected for analyzing the reactive MW plasma upgradation. Results demonstrate that conventional thermal pyrolysis lacks effectiveness in upgrading the precursors. To gain insight into the underlying reasons, chemical kinetic simulations were conducted. Oppositely, reactive MW plasma pyrolysis demonstrated remarkable precursor upgradation. These condensed MW plasma pyrolysis products were then subjected to a carbonization and graphitization heat-treatment with a comprehensive graphitic quality assessment conducted using X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. After graphitization, the MW plasma-upgraded precursor produced a carbon with a crystallite size several times greater than that of the initial benzene. By MW plasma processing, the poorly graphitizable benzene precursor was transformed into a highly graphitizable precursor comparable to coal tar pitch. The underlying reasons for this significant improvement were investigated by analyzing the compositional changes in the precursor under various reactive environments.

Identifiers

PMID37929106
PMCPMC10620900
OpenAlexW4387735004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.