ArticleAdvances in ophthalmology practice and research
Search of inhibitors of aldose reductase for treatment of diabetic cataracts using machine learning.
Article in Advances in ophthalmology practice and research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fullerenol Eye Drops Mitigate UVB-Induced Cataract Progression by Inhibiting Oxidative Stress and Cellular Senescence.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Patients with diabetes mellitus have an elevated chance of developing cataracts, a degenerative vision-impairing condition often needing surgery. The process of the reduction of glucose to sorbitol in the lens of the human eye that causes cataracts is managed by the Aldose Reductase Enzyme (AR), and it is been found that AR inhibitors may mitigate the onset of diabetic cataracts. There exists a large pool of natural and synthetic AR inhibitors that can prevent diabetic complications, and the development of a machine-learning (ML) prediction model may bring new AR inhibitors with better characteristics into clinical use. Methods: Using known AR inhibitors and their chemical-physical descriptors we created the ML model for prediction of new AR inhibitors. The predicted inhibitors were tested by computational docking to the binding site of AR. Results: Using cross-validation in order to find the most accurate ML model, we ended with final cross-validation accuracy of 90%. Computational docking testing of the predicted inhibitors gave a high level of correlation between the ML prediction score and binding free energy. Conclusions: Currently known AR inhibitors are not used yet for patients for several reasons. We think that new predicted AR inhibitors have the potential to possess more favorable characteristics to be successfully implemented after clinical testing. Exploring new inhibitors can improve patient well-being and lower surgical complications all while decreasing long-term medical expenses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.