Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37928834›Full record

ArticleJVS-vascular science2023

Evaluation of hydrophilic polymer embolization from endovascular sheath devices in an in vitro perfusion system.

Alexa Mordhorst, Gary K Yang, Nicholas Reitsma, Jerry C Chen, Bei Yuan Zhang, Sahib Suri, Joel Gagnon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JVS-vascular science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. We don't know what we don't know, until we do.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexa MordhorstDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Gary K YangDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Nicholas ReitsmaDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jerry C ChenDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Bei Yuan ZhangDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Sahib SuriDepartment of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Joel GagnonDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Case reports, tissue pathology, and autopsies have suggested that the hydrophilic polymer coating designed to improve endovascular deliverability and minimize vessel trauma can embolize and be associated with adverse outcomes such as ischemia, infarction, and death. This study sought to determine whether hydrophilic polymers shed off commercially available sheaths in a controlled in vitro environment, with the hypothesis that significant differences between coated and uncoated (control) sheaths would be found. Methods: Six sheaths from each manufacturer, including Zenith Alpha abdominal endovascular stent grafts (Cook Medical), DrySeal sheaths (W.L. Gore & Associates), and Sentrant Introducer sheaths (Medtronic), were tested in an in vitro environment. Noncoated Check-Flo performer introducer sheaths (Cook Medical) were used as controls. Each test circuit ran for 150 minutes at an output of 3 L/min, the circuit was then drained and the fluid collected. Quantitative analysis included weighing the dried filter paper and using particle size light scattering to quantify the particle size and count. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy was also used. Results: Each of the three coated sheaths had significantly greater shedding compared with the control sheaths. The Cook Zenith alpha sheath had significantly more residue weight (2.87 ± 0.52 mg/L) than the Gore DrySeal (1.07 ± 0.06 mg/L) and Medtronic Sentrant introducer (0.98 ± 0.14 mg/L) sheaths. The average particle size was not significantly different between the coated and uncoated (control) sheaths. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy identified sheath particulate in the Cook Zenith Alpha and Medtronic Sentrant samples. Conclusions: Polymer embolization was present and significantly greater in all three commercially available hydrophilic sheaths compared with the control group. Further investigation is needed into the clinical significance of these findings.

Indexed as

AneurysmClinical engineeringEndovascular aneurysm repairHeparinized hydrophilic polymerPostoperative complications

Identifiers

PMID37928834
PMCPMC10624583
OpenAlexW4386700837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.