Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37928810›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Natural Language Processing to Extract Meaningful Information from a Corpus of Written Knowledge in Breast Cancer: Transforming Books into Data.

Giuseppe Catanuto, Nicola Rocco, Konstantina Balafa, Yazan Masannat, Andreas Karakatsanis, Anna Maglia, Peter Barry, Francesco Pappalardo, Maurizio Bruno Nava, Francesco Caruso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Giuseppe CatanutoG.RE.T.A. Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements, Milan, Naples, Catania, Italy.
Nicola RoccoG.RE.T.A. Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements, Milan, Naples, Catania, Italy.
Konstantina BalafaBreast Surgery Unit, Humanitas Center, Catania, Italy.
Yazan MasannatThe Breast Unit, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK.
Andreas KarakatsanisDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna MagliaG.RE.T.A. Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements, Milan, Naples, Catania, Italy.
Peter BarryDepartment of Drug and Health Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Francesco PappalardoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK.
Maurizio Bruno NavaG.RE.T.A. Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements, Milan, Naples, Catania, Italy.
Francesco CarusoBreast Surgery Unit, Humanitas Center, Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Books and papers are the most relevant source of theoretical knowledge for medical education. New technologies of artificial intelligence can be designed to assist in selected educational tasks, such as reading a corpus made up of multiple documents and extracting relevant information in a quantitative way. Methods: Thirty experts were selected transparently using an online public call on the website of the sponsor organization and on its social media. Six books edited or co-edited by members of this panel containing a general knowledge of breast cancer or specific surgical knowledge have been acquired. This collection was used by a team of computer scientists to train an artificial neural network based on a technique called Word2Vec. Results: The corpus of six books contained about 2.2 billion words for 300d vectors. A few tests were performed. We evaluated cosine similarity between different words. Discussion: This work represents an initial attempt to derive formal information from textual corpus. It can be used to perform an augmented reading of the corpus of knowledge available in books and papers as part of a discipline. This can generate new hypothesis and provide an actual estimate of their association within the expert opinions. Word embedding can also be a good tool when used in accruing narrative information from clinical notes, reports, etc., and produce prediction about outcomes. More work is expected in this promising field to generate "real-world evidence."

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceBreast cancerMedical education

Identifiers

PMID37928810
PMCPMC10624050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.