ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry2023
Quantitative and Qualitative Correlation of Mandibular Lingual Bone with Risk Factors for Third Molar Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does the Position of the Mandibular Third Molar Have an Effect on the Lingual Bone Morphology? A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Root-level vulnerability and lingual plate fracture risk in mandibular third molars: A retrospective CBCT-based cross-sectional study.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lingual plate thickness, density, and proximity to the tooth are linked as risk factors for various complications associated with third molar extraction. The present study aimed to assess the lingual plate thickness, and density in the mandibular third molar region using cone beam computed tomography and to estimate its correlation with type and level of impaction, number of roots, age, and gender as the risk factors. Methods: This was a retrospective study on CBCT images of 648 mandibular third molars. The lingual plate thickness at three different root levels - cervical, mid-root, and apex along with the position of the tooth, number of roots, density of lingual plate, age, and gender were evaluated. The measurements were done on Invivo 5-Anatomage software. Statistical comparison of the categorical variables was done by Chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test, and univariate and multivariate analysis were done using binomial logistic regression. Results: Lingual plate thickness of the third molars at the cervical, mid root, and apex were 1.28 mm, 1.42 mm and .01 mm (mean). A significantly higher proportion of subjects with thin lingual plates at mid-root (p-value=0.01) and apex (p-value=0.05) were in the 21-30 age group. Lingual bone density was significantly associated with the thickness of the lingual plate at the mid-root. A significantly higher proportion of thinner lingual plates at the mid-root level were associated with mesioangularly placed third molars (p-value=0.002). Conclusion: Our study presented that lingual plate thickness has a strong association with age, angulation, and the number of roots. Knowledge about these risk factors is imperative during the management of third molar impactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.