Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37928753›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine2023

Conservative Kidney Management Practice Patterns and Resources in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of CKDopps (Chronic Kidney Disease Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study) Data.

Jennifer S Scherer, Brian Bieber, Natalia Alencar de Pinho, Tahsin Masud, Bruce Robinson, Roberto Pecoits-Filho, Joy Schiedell, Keith Goldfeld, Joshua Chodosh, David M Charytan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The autonomic nervous system and bone health in chronic kidney disease.European journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jennifer S SchererNYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Care, New York, NY.
Brian BieberArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI.
Natalia Alencar de PinhoCESP (Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations), Université Paris Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (Inserm), Equipe Epidémiologie Clinique, Villejuif, France.
Tahsin MasudEmory University, Department of Internal Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Bruce RobinsonUniversity of Michigan, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Ann Arbor, MI.
Roberto Pecoits-FilhoArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI.
Joy SchiedellNYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, Division of Biostatistics, New York, NY.
Keith GoldfeldNYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, Division of Biostatistics, New York, NY.
Joshua ChodoshNYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Care, New York, NY.
David M CharytanNYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, New York, NY.

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG066512 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Arline Faustin · 2020 to 2026
$28.4M
Supportive Care in Kidney Disease: Scope of Practice and Pilot Study of ImplementationK23DK125840 · NIDDK · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SCHERER, JENNIFER S · 2020 to 2024
$962k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066512NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK125840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale & Objective: Conservative kidney management (CKM) is a viable treatment option for many patients with chronic kidney disease. However, CKM practices and resources in the United States are not well described. We undertook this study to gain a better understanding of factors influencing uptake of CKM by describing: (1) characteristics of patients who choose CKM, (2) provider practice patterns relevant to CKM, and (3) CKM resources available to providers. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting & Participants: This study is a cross-sectional analysis of data from US nephrology clinics enrolled in the chronic kidney disease Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (CKDopps) collected between 2014 and 2020. Data for this study includes chart-abstracted characteristics of patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤30mL/min/1.73m Analytical Approach: Descriptive statistics were used to report patient demographics, clinical information, provider demographics, and clinic characteristics. Results: Among data from 1018 patients, 68 (7%) were recorded as planning for CKM. These patients were older, had more comorbidities, and were more likely to require assistance with transfers. Of the 407 patient surveys, 18% reported a conversation about forgoing dialysis with their nephrologist. A majority of providers felt comfortable discussing CKM; however, no clinics had a dedicated clinic or protocol for CKM. Limitations: Inconsistent survey terminology and unlinked patient and provider responses. Conclusions: Few patients reported discussion of forgoing dialysis with their providers and even fewer anticipated a choice of CKM on reaching kidney failure. Most providers were comfortable discussing CKM, but practiced in clinics that lacked dedicated resources. Further research is needed to improve the implementation of a CKM pathway. Plain-Language Summary: For older comorbid adults with kidney failure, conservative kidney management (CKM) can be an appropriate treatment choice. CKM is a holistic approach with treatment goals of maximizing quality of life and preventing progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) without initiation of dialysis. We investigated US CKM practices and found that among 1018 people with CKD, only 7% were planning for CKM. Of 407 surveyed patients, 18% reported a conversation with their provider about forgoing dialysis. In contrast, most providers felt comfortable discussing CKM; however, none reported working in an environment with a dedicated CKM clinic or protocol. Our data show the need for further CKM education in the United States as well as dedicated resources for its delivery.

Indexed as

Conservative kidney managementpractice patternsresources

Identifiers

PMID37928753
PMCPMC10624579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.