ReviewFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2023
Person-centered care for people with aphasia: tools for shared decision-making.
Review in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Informed Consent in Patients with Aphasia: Scoping Review of Clinical Decision-Making Tools and Medico-Legal Issues.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Characteristics of person-centred practice in the stroke patient trajectory: a scoping review.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Computational Thinking as a Novel Framework for Enhancing Cognitive Organization in Older Adults with Cognitive Frailty.Annals of geriatric medicine and research · 2025Article
- Healthcare Access, Satisfaction, and Affordability: Experiences and Barriers of People with Aphasia.Aphasiology · 2025Article
- Treatment of aphasia in linguistically diverse populations: current and future directions.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
- Exploration of collaborative goal setting in occupational therapy for adults with aphasia.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2025Article
- Article
- Navigating Rehabilitation Transitions at Street Level: A Qualitative Analysis of Municipal Service Allocation to Individuals With Complex Needs.Health services insights · 2024Article
- Cypriot Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge and Skills When Interacting With Patients With Aphasia in Clinical Settings.International journal of language & communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shared decision-making is a fundamental aspect of person-centered care, and can and should be part of many different aspects of the rehabilitation process. Communication disabilities like aphasia, which affects people's ability to use and understand spoken and written language, can make shared decision-making especially challenging to the resources and skills of rehabilitation practitioners. The purpose of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive description of tools that can support successful shared decision-making with people with aphasia in the rehabilitation environment. These tools and strategies are appropriate for use by physicians, nurses, social workers, physical therapists (also referred to as physiotherapists), occupational therapists, and other service or care providers. The important role of speech-language pathologists as consultants is also described. Case scenarios throughout the paper illustrate the application of recommended tools and strategies along with best practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.