Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37928633›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023

Inframammary versus Periareolar Incision: A Comparison of Early Complications in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy.

Francisco P Cavalcante, Ticiane O Lima, Ryane Alcantara, Amanda Cardoso, Flora Ulisses, Guilherme Novita, Felipe Zerwes, Eduardo Millen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Assisted Breast Reconstruction With Biosynthetic Mesh and Implants: A Pilot Study.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francisco P CavalcanteFrom Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Ticiane O LimaFrom Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Ryane AlcantaraFrom Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Amanda CardosoFrom Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Flora UlissesFrom Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Guilherme NovitaInstituto Oncoclínicas, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Felipe ZerwesPontificia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUC-RS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Eduardo MillenInstituto Oncoclínicas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Hospital Geral de Fortaleza · BRInstituto de Oncologia do Paraná · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), either used therapeutically or prophylactically, may yield more complications than conventional mastectomy. The incision may affect aesthetic outcome and complication rates, with periareolar incisions being associated with nipple-areolar complex (NAC) necrosis. Methods: Early complications were compared between NSM performed in 2015-2022 using inframammary fold (IMF) or periareolar incisions. Results: Overall, 180 procedures in 152 patients (bilateral NSM = 28) were included (IMF = 104; periareolar = 76). Mean age (47 versus 43.9 years; Conclusions: Both incisions are viable options; however, the risk of NAC necrosis increased with the periareolar approach. Further research is required.

Identifiers

PMID37928633
PMCPMC10624459
OpenAlexW4388291528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.