ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602023
Rectal Urgency Among Patients With Ulcerative Colitis or Crohn's Disease: Analyses from a Global Survey.
Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Urgency Numeric Rating Scale: Psychometric Evaluation in Adults with Crohn's Disease.Advances in therapy · 2025Trial
- Bowel Urgency in Crohn's Disease: Bridging the Gap Between Patients and Healthcare Providers.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Broad Impact of Bowel Urgency in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: US, European, and Japanese Patient and Healthcare Professional Perspectives from the Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) Survey.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Psychological Profiles in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: Distinct Emotional and Behavioral Patterns.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Patient perception of bowel urgency and remission in moderately to severely active Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis: a qualitative study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
- Editorial: Rectal Urgency Among Patients with Ulcerative Colitis or Crohn's Disease: Analyses from a Global Survey.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rectal urgency is a common but under-reported inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) symptom. The present study assessed the prevalence of rectal urgency and its association with disease activity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) in a real-world setting. Methods: Data were drawn from the 2017-2018 Adelphi IBD Disease Specific Programme™, a multi-center, point-in-time survey of gastroenterologists and consulting adult patients with UC or CD in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Gastroenterologists completed patient record forms and patients completed self-reported forms. Analyses were conducted separately for patients with UC or CD. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, disease activity, symptoms, and PROs were compared between patients with and without rectal urgency. Results: In total, 1057 patients with UC and 1228 patients with CD were included. Rectal urgency was reported in 20.2% of patients with UC and 16.4% with CD. Patients with rectal urgency were more likely to have moderate or severe disease (UC or CD: Conclusions: Rectal urgency is a common symptom associated with high disease activity, decreased work productivity, and worse quality of life. Further studies are needed to include rectal urgency assessment in routine clinical practice to better gauge disease activity in patients with UC or CD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.